FAKIR MOHMED HAJI HASAN vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITR/267/1993HC GujaratGJHC24021294199310 August 2000Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE6 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tribunal was correct in its findings. Regarding the first issue, the Court affirmed that the assessee was found in possession of gold valued at Rs. 48.72 lacs, and since no satisfactory explanation was provided for the source of its acquisition, its value was rightly deemed to be the income of the assessee under Section 69A. The Court reasoned that the scheme of Sections 69, 69A, 69B, and 69C treats unexplained investments, money, bullion, etc., and expenditure as deemed income when the nature and source are not explained. For the second issue, the Court held that no deduction was allowable for the confiscated gold. The reasoning was that the deemed income under Section 69A does not fall under any specific head of income like 'profits and gains of business or profession' or 'income from other sources' because the source is unknown. Consequently, deductions applicable to those heads, such as trading loss, cannot be claimed. The Court distinguished this from cases where profits of an illegal business are taxed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan, is challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decision for Assessment Year 1984-85. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) added Rs. 48,72,000, the value of gold seized from the assessee on April 19, 1983, to his income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the source of investment was unexplained. An additional Rs. 46,000 recovered during the seizure was also added. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the ITAT upheld these additions. The ITAT found that the assessee was apprehended with 232 gold bars of foreign markings concealed in his car, along with currency notes. The gold was confiscated by the Customs Department, and the assessee was penalized under the Customs Act.

What were the issues?

The High Court was asked to decide two questions of law referred by the ITAT: 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was in possession of gold valued at Rs. 48.72 lacs, was its owner, and that its value was liable to be included in his income due to no explanation regarding the source of investment? (Section 69A) 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that no deduction in respect of the value of confiscated gold was allowable from the assessee's income? (Sections 14, 69A) Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that the confiscation of gold represented a trading loss in his business. The revenue contended that the value of the gold was an unexplained investment and therefore taxable as income under Section 69A, and no deduction for confiscation was permissible as it was not a business loss.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 256,Section 143,Section 69A,Section 112,Section 108,Section 4,Section 5,Section 69,Section 69B,Section 69C,Section 14

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 136 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 267 of 1993

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256

All 55 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →