32 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 256.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed
Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Kul Bharat
In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed
Bench: Shri N.R.S.Ganesan & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony
The appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed
Bench: The Board For Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (Bifr) Under Sick Industrial Companies Act (Sica). At That 1 Digitally Signed By Nidhi Ahuja Date: 2017.08.31 15:02:11 Ist Reason: Signature Not Verified
Bench: The Tribunal. In The Statement Of Case, Learned Tribunal Framed The Following Two Substantial Questions Of Law :- 1. Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Tribunal Was Right In Law In Holding That Grounds Nos.3 & 4 Raised By The Appellant In The Memorandum Of Appeal Were Wide Enough To Permit Two Additional Grounds To Be Raised In As Vijay Asija 2015.01.14 13:24 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document
Bench: Us, Challenging Order Dated 29.11.2007 (Annexure A-3), Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench 'B”. Chandigarh, For Assessment Year 2003-04, On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- “(I) Whether In Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Action Of The Authorities Below In Holding The Sale Tax Subsidy Received By The Appellant As A Revenue Receipt, When The Same Has Been Rightly Held To Fall Under The Capital Receipt As Laid Down By The Hon'Ble Supreme Court In K.C.P. Ltd. V. Cit(2000) 245 Itr 421(Sc) Is Legally Sustainable In The Eyes Naresh Kumar 2015.01.12 15:11 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authenticity Of This Document Chandigarh
The appeals are disposed of
Bench: 2 Judges
The appeal is dismissed
In the result, both the questions are answered
Appeal is allowed
Bench: 3 Judges
Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2