ITO-28.3.1, MUMBAI vs. VAIBHAV CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY, GHANSOLI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is a cooperative society and not a cooperative bank, and therefore, it is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on transactions with its members. The deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) was also allowed as the assessee does not fall under Section 80P(4).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a credit cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned from deposits with a cooperative bank. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction, arguing that the assessee was a cooperative bank and Section 80P(4) restricted such deductions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, a credit cooperative society, is eligible for deduction under Section 80P on interest income earned from a cooperative bank, and whether Section 80P(4) disallows this deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions’ Federation Ltd., Lucknow v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow-I120 citing11 SCC 287 · 1997
- Pr.CIT v. Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.71 citing150 Taxmann.com 173 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.44/Mum/2024is against the order of Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi,vide order no.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1057763170(1), dated 07.11.2023, passed against the assessment order by National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi u/s. 143(3) read with Vaibhav Co-op Credit Society, AY 2014-15, 2018-19 & 2021-22 sections 143(3A) & 143(3B)of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 24.03.2021 for Assessment Year 2018-19. 1. 1. The appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No.46/Mum/2024 is against the order of ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, vid
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026