M/S SRI AUROBINDO COMPLEX TRUST,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD-3, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the accumulation permitted under Section 11(1)(a) is to be computed on gross receipts, not net receipts. This decision was based on a precedent set by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s. Sri Aurobindo Complex Trust, appealed an order concerning the calculation of accumulation permitted under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act. The core dispute was whether this accumulation should be calculated on net receipts or gross receipts.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was the basis for calculating the 15% accumulation allowed under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act – whether it should be on gross or net receipts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Programme for Community Organisation90 citing248 ITR 1 · 2001 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘SMC-B’, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K.GARODIA, ACCOUNANT MEMBER
O R D E R PER A. K. GARODIA, A.M.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee which is directed against the order of CIT (A) – 14, Bangalore dated 31.05.2017 for A. Y. 2012 – 13.
The assessee has raised as many as 6 grounds but the effective grievance is only one and that is this that whether the accumulation to the extent of 15% permitted u/s 11 (1) (a) is to be calculated on net receipts or gross receipts.
Learned AR of the assessee submitted that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of Hon’ble apex court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Programme for Community Organisation as reported in 248 ITR 1, copy available on pages 117 to 119 of the paper book and in particular, my attention was drawn to page 119 of the paper book. Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of the authorities below.
I have considered the rival submissions. In the case cited by the learned AR of the assessee, it was held that the accumulation has to be computed at the prescribed percentage of gross receipt and not net receipt. Respectfully following this judgment, this issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
More judgments on Section 11(1)(a)
- Sri Vidyanikethan Educational Trust… vs DCIT Exemption Cir, VijayawadaITA 412/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Porwal Charitable Trust, Thane vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 7604/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Jain Citizen Education Society, Surendra… vs ITO, Ward-2, Exmp, AhmedabadITA 737/AHD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Vanita Samaj, Mumbai vs Jurisdiction Exem Ward 2(4), MumbaiITA 8116/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026