THE JALESWAR COOPERATIVE LARGE SIZED AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. ITO, WARD - 49(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had a sufficient cause for non-appearance before the CIT(A) due to traffic blockage. Therefore, the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, filed its return declaring Nil income. The AO disallowed its claim for deduction under Section 80P(2) on interest income earned from a non-banking society, determining total income at Rs. 19,05,228. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the assessee's explanation for non-appearance. The core issue of the deduction claim under Section 80P(2) was not decided on merits by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, KZ]
order : May 01, 2019 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 15, Kolkata dated 11.05.2018 passed ex-parte whereby he dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
The assessee in the present is co-operative society which is carrying on the activity of sale of agricultural produce and non- banking. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 16.03.2013 declaring a total income at Nil. In the assessment completed u/s 143(3) vide an order dated 13.02.2015, the total income of the assessee was determined by the AO at Rs. 19,05,228/- after disallowing the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act in respect of interest income of Rs. 19,05,228/- earned by the assessee from non-cooperative bank and the society.
Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Jaleswar Co-operative Large Sized Agricultural Credit Society Ltd.
Against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) and since there was no compliance on the part of the assessee to the notices issued by him fixing the said appeal for hearing from time to time, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee vide his appellate order dated 11.05.2018 passed ex-parte. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. As submitted by the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal of the assessee was fixed for hearing by the Ld. CIT(A) on 12.01.2018 but due to big procession for Vivekananda’s Birth Day and consequent traffic blockage of the way, the authorised representative of the assessee, Mr. Shyam Mullick could not reach the office of the Ld. CIT(A) in time. Keeping in view this submission made by the learned counsel for the assessee which is duly supported by an affidavit filed by the Manager of the society, I am satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for the non-appearance of the assessee when its appeal was fixed for hearing before the Ld. CIT(A) on 12.01.2018. I, therefore, set aside the impugned order passed by Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte and remit the matter back to him for disposing of the appeal of the assessee afresh on merit after giving proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee. As undertaken by the learned counsel for the assessee, the assessee shall make due compliance before the Ld. CIT(A) and shall extend all the cooperation in order to enable the Ld. CIT(A) to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.
Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Jaleswar Co-operative Large Sized Agricultural Credit Society Ltd. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 1st May, 2019.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)
- The Mrutyunjaya Large Size Co Operative… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PalakolITA 839/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Bank… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2299/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2298/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2018-19
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2297/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Mumbai Vidi Tambakhu Vyapari Sahakari… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2)(2), Piramal…ITA 1801/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 May 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026