THE JALESWAR COOPERATIVE LARGE SIZED AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,NORTH 24 PARGANAS vs. ITO, WARD - 49(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2630/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 May 2019AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee had a sufficient cause for non-appearance before the CIT(A) due to traffic blockage. Therefore, the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society, filed its return declaring Nil income. The AO disallowed its claim for deduction under Section 80P(2) on interest income earned from a non-banking society, determining total income at Rs. 19,05,228. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte due to non-compliance.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the assessee's explanation for non-appearance. The core issue of the deduction claim under Section 80P(2) was not decided on merits by the CIT(A).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (SMC

Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, KZ]

order : May 01, 2019 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 15, Kolkata dated 11.05.2018 passed ex-parte whereby he dismissed the appeal of the assessee.

2.

The assessee in the present is co-operative society which is carrying on the activity of sale of agricultural produce and non- banking. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 16.03.2013 declaring a total income at Nil. In the assessment completed u/s 143(3) vide an order dated 13.02.2015, the total income of the assessee was determined by the AO at Rs. 19,05,228/- after disallowing the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act in respect of interest income of Rs. 19,05,228/- earned by the assessee from non-cooperative bank and the society.

Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Jaleswar Co-operative Large Sized Agricultural Credit Society Ltd.

3.

Against the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3), an appeal was preferred by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) and since there was no compliance on the part of the assessee to the notices issued by him fixing the said appeal for hearing from time to time, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee vide his appellate order dated 11.05.2018 passed ex-parte. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

I have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. As submitted by the learned counsel for the assessee, the appeal of the assessee was fixed for hearing by the Ld. CIT(A) on 12.01.2018 but due to big procession for Vivekananda’s Birth Day and consequent traffic blockage of the way, the authorised representative of the assessee, Mr. Shyam Mullick could not reach the office of the Ld. CIT(A) in time. Keeping in view this submission made by the learned counsel for the assessee which is duly supported by an affidavit filed by the Manager of the society, I am satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for the non-appearance of the assessee when its appeal was fixed for hearing before the Ld. CIT(A) on 12.01.2018. I, therefore, set aside the impugned order passed by Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte and remit the matter back to him for disposing of the appeal of the assessee afresh on merit after giving proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee. As undertaken by the learned counsel for the assessee, the assessee shall make due compliance before the Ld. CIT(A) and shall extend all the cooperation in order to enable the Ld. CIT(A) to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.

1.

Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Jaleswar Co-operative Large Sized Agricultural Credit Society Ltd. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 1st May, 2019.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)

All 332 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →