ACIT CIRCLE-58(1), DELHI vs. MAGICAL ENTERPRISES L.L.P , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no violation of Section 10(34A) and no evidence of a sham transaction. The Tribunal also found the CIT(A)'s reasoning for allowing LTCG at the special rate to be sound.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(34A) on profits from a share buyback scheme. The Assessing Officer disallowed this exemption, alleging the transactions were a sham to convert unaccounted money. The assessee also claimed Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) taxed at a special rate.
What were the issues?
Whether the exemption under Section 10(34A) for share buyback profits was rightly denied by the AO, and whether LTCG was correctly treated as income from other sources instead of capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(34A),Section 115QA,Section 112,Section 143(3),Section 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan691 citing263 ITR 706 · 2003 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “E” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM : The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Revenue seeking to assail the First Appellate order dated 16.03.2022 passed by Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi [“Ld.CIT(A)”] under s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising from the assessment order dated 31.12.2018 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act pertaining to assessment year 2016-17. The assessee, in turn, has also filed Cross Objection No. 86/Del/2022 against the Revenue’s Appeal in ITA No.1059/Del/202
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115QA
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Seaview Developers Pvt Ltd, DelhiITA 2719/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Seaview Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Deputy Comissioner of Income-Tax Circle…ITA 2621/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- M/S Saraswati Properties Limited, Bareilly vs DCIT, Central Circle-2, KanpurITA 699/LKW/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Pennar Industries Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 832/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
- Aptara Technologies Private Limited, Pune vs DCIT, Circle1(1), PuneITA 63/PUN/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026