M/S SARASWATI PROPERTIES LIMITED ,BAREILLY vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KANPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed credit for tax paid on buyback of shares, which was not fully granted in the intimation under section 143(1). The assessee's application for rectification under section 154 was rejected, and the subsequent appeal to the CIT(A) was also dismissed.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant credit for prepaid taxes after due verification. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with these directions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to credit for tax paid on buyback of shares, and whether such credit can be adjusted against regular income tax demand.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE- & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.
(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)-2, Kanpur, dated 08.08.2025, for the AY 2020-21. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned CIT (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts to confirm the disallowance of the credit of Rs. 12,68,468/- Tax Paid on account of buyback of shares in terms of section 115 QA of the Act inspite of credit in Form 26AS and the challan for payment on record.
The learned CIT (Appeals) could not appreciate the facts of the case and has erred on facts and in law to held that the tax paid under section 115 QA can not be adjusted against the regular income tax d
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115QA
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Seaview Developers Pvt Ltd, DelhiITA 2719/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Seaview Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs The Deputy Comissioner of Income-Tax Circle…ITA 2621/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Pennar Industries Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 832/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
- Aptara Technologies Private Limited, Pune vs DCIT, Circle1(1), PuneITA 63/PUN/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed17 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
- ACIT, Chennai vs Updater Services Limited, ChennaiITA 1616/CHNY/2025[2017]Status: Disposed14 Nov 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026