S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act was bad in law and quashed it, along with the consequential assessment order. The Tribunal found that the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion and lacked proper grounds for invoking Section 147/148.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment for AY 2012-13 under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on information about bogus sub-contractor expenses. The assessee argued that the reassessment proceedings were bad in law, particularly questioning the initiation under Section 148 instead of Section 153C.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148, specifically whether the AO had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment and if the correct section was invoked.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO384 citing41 ITR 191 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Foramer France253 citing264 ITR 566 · 2003 · SC
- Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT205 citing119 ITR 996 · 1979 · SC
- Foramer France v. CIT77 citing247 ITR 436 · 2001 · HC
- Jindal Photo Films Ltd. v. DCIT71 citing234 ITR 170 · 1998 · HC
- 147. In Rakesh Aggarwal v. Asstt. CIT63 citing225 ITR 496 · 1997 · HC
- Rajinder Nath v. CIT56 citing120 ITR 14 · 1979 · SC
- Shree Tharad Jain Yuvak Mandal v. ITO45 citing242 ITR 612 · 2000 · HC
- Gemini Leather Stores v. ITO33 citing100 ITR 1 · 1975 · SC
- Deputy CIT v. ONGC20 citing70 ITD 468 · 1999 · ITAT
- Garden Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT17 citing240 ITR 628 · 1999 · HC
- Rajinder Nath v. CIT13 citing135 ITR 504 · 1982 · HC
- 2011 (Delhi H C) (vii) Madhukar Khosla Vs. ACIT 367 ITR 165 (Del) (viii) CIT v. Foramer France8 citing236 ITR 477 · 1999 · SC
- Rajshree Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others5 citing457 ITR 354 · 2023 · HC
- CIT v. Tarajan Tea Co. (P.) Ltd.4 citing135 ITR 511 · 1982 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY,
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP
This appeal by assessee is arising out of the order of CIT(A)-3 Gurgaon in appeal No. 10314/2019-20 dated
2023. The assessment was framed by DCIT, Central
Circle-I Chandigarh for the assessment year 2012-13 under ITA 514/CHD/2023 A.Y. 2012-13 2
Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (hereinafter
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026