Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT

119 ITR 996Supreme Court of India1979#440 most cited

What is Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT authority for?

An assessment cannot be reopened under Section 147/148 based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer on material already considered during the original assessment, clarifying the scope of 'escaped assessment'.

205

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT · 119 ITR 996 · Section 147 · Section 148 · reopening assessment · change of opinion · validity of reassessment · material already considered · Kalyanji Mavji clarification · quasi-judicial proceedings · opportunity of being heard · Section 147(b)

Also reported as

2 Taxmann 1972 Taxmann.com 197

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 144Section 14ASection 80PSection 151Section 115JB

Issues it is cited on

recognised provident fundsection 147(b)section 50bsection 43b(f)approved gratuity fundsection 40a(9)section 211wholly and exclusively for businesssection 35dsection 32(1)(ii)slump salekelvinator

Judgments citing Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT

GRANULES INDIA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1289/HYD/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha G. Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं / Ita No.1289/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-11) Granules India Limited Vs. Dcit- Circle -2(1) 15Th Floor, Granules Tower Signature Tower, Botanical Garden Road Sy. No. 6(P) Of Kondaput Kondapur, Hyderabad – 500084 Sy. No. 37 Of Kothaguda Telangana Opp. Botanical Gardens Serilingampalluy, R.R. District Pan: Aaacg7369K Hyderabad-500084, Telangana (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 148Section 154Section 271(1)(c)

…आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण में, हैदराबाद ‘बी’ बेंच, हैदराबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD “B” BENCH, HYDERABAD श्री विजय पाल राि, माननीय उपाध्यक्ष एवं श्री मंजुनाथा जी, माननीय लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं / ITA No.1289/HYD/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2010-11) Granules India Limited Vs. DCIT- Circle -2(1) 15th Floor, Granules Tower Signature Tower, Botanical Garden Road SY. No. 6(P) of Kondaput Kondapur, Hyderabad – 500084 SY. NO. 37 of Kothaguda Telangana Opp. Botanical Gardens Serilingamp…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, YAMUNANAGAR vs. M/S THE VED PARKASH MUKAND LAL, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals, for both the years, stand dismissed

ITA 833/CHANDI/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Mar 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.824/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.825/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Dcit Educational Society Circle Yamuna Nagar बनाम/ Vs. (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Haryana C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.833/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.832/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Dcit The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Circle Yamuna Nagar Educational Society बनाम/ Haryana (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Vs. C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Yamini (Cit) - Ld. Dr (Virtual)

For Appellant: Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Yamini (CIT) - Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

…ITR 248).These decisions duly support the reopening of the case of the assessee and have rightly been quoted by Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order. 9. The Ld. AR has quoted the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society (119 ITR 996) for the proposition that audit objection could not be treated as information u/s 147 of the act. However, upon perusal of this case law, we find that this case law deal with a situation when an opinion was already formed by Ld. AO during original assessment proceedings on the heads of income whereas audit party opined differently. The same is no…

DCIT vs. M/S THE VED PARKASH MUKAND LAL, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals, for both the years, stand dismissed

ITA 832/CHANDI/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Mar 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.824/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.825/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Dcit Educational Society Circle Yamuna Nagar बनाम/ Vs. (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Haryana C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.833/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.832/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Dcit The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Circle Yamuna Nagar Educational Society बनाम/ Haryana (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Vs. C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Yamini (Cit) - Ld. Dr (Virtual)

For Appellant: Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Yamini (CIT) - Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

…ITR 248).These decisions duly support the reopening of the case of the assessee and have rightly been quoted by Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order. 9. The Ld. AR has quoted the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society (119 ITR 996) for the proposition that audit objection could not be treated as information u/s 147 of the act. However, upon perusal of this case law, we find that this case law deal with a situation when an opinion was already formed by Ld. AO during original assessment proceedings on the heads of income whereas audit party opined differently. The same is no…

THE VED PRAKASH MUKAND LAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,YAMUNANAGAR vs. DCIT, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals, for both the years, stand dismissed

ITA 825/CHANDI/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Mar 2026AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.824/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.825/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Dcit Educational Society Circle Yamuna Nagar बनाम/ Vs. (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Haryana C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.833/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.832/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Dcit The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Circle Yamuna Nagar Educational Society बनाम/ Haryana (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Vs. C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Yamini (Cit) - Ld. Dr (Virtual)

For Appellant: Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Yamini (CIT) - Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

…ITR 248).These decisions duly support the reopening of the case of the assessee and have rightly been quoted by Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order. 9. The Ld. AR has quoted the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society (119 ITR 996) for the proposition that audit objection could not be treated as information u/s 147 of the act. However, upon perusal of this case law, we find that this case law deal with a situation when an opinion was already formed by Ld. AO during original assessment proceedings on the heads of income whereas audit party opined differently. The same is no…

THE VED PRAKASH MUKAND LAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,YAMUNANAGAR vs. DCIT, YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals, for both the years, stand dismissed

ITA 824/CHANDI/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Mar 2026AY 2005-06

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am 1. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.824/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 2. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.825/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Dcit Educational Society Circle Yamuna Nagar बनाम/ Vs. (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Haryana C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & 3. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.833/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) & 4. आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.832/Chandi/2014 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2006-07) Dcit The Ved Prakash Mukand Lal Circle Yamuna Nagar Educational Society बनाम/ Haryana (Radaur, Yamuna Nagar) Vs. C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) #527, Sector – 10D, Chandigarh "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaatv-4812-B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Yamini (Cit) - Ld. Dr (Virtual)

For Appellant: Sh. Tejmohan Singh (Advocate) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Yamini (CIT) - Ld. DR (Virtual)
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147

…ITR 248).These decisions duly support the reopening of the case of the assessee and have rightly been quoted by Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order. 9. The Ld. AR has quoted the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society (119 ITR 996) for the proposition that audit objection could not be treated as information u/s 147 of the act. However, upon perusal of this case law, we find that this case law deal with a situation when an opinion was already formed by Ld. AO during original assessment proceedings on the heads of income whereas audit party opined differently. The same is no…

DCIT-2(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. BANK OF BARODA , BANK OF BARODA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and both the cross objections

ITA 4913/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Appellant: Shri C. Naresh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vimal Kumar Meena, (CIT DR)
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 14ASection 244ASection 250Section 36(1)(viia)

…ssue whether reopening is permissible after the audit report opines on a question of law. In a subsequent decision by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society vs. Commissioner of Income-tax [1979] 2 Taxman 197 (SC)/[1979] 119 ITR 996 (SC)/[1979] 12 CTR 190 (SC)[31-08- 1979] held that the opinion on law rendered on the basis of audit report cannot be the basis for re-assessment rather it has to be the Ld. AO who should apply his mind not merely on the information by external agency but by evaluation of law, else it could lead to grave consequence of the external agencies ta…

DCIT-2(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. BANK OF BARODA, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and both the cross objections

ITA 4869/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm

For Appellant: Shri C. Naresh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vimal Kumar Meena, (CIT DR)
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 14ASection 244ASection 250Section 36(1)(viia)

…ssue whether reopening is permissible after the audit report opines on a question of law. In a subsequent decision by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society vs. Commissioner of Income-tax [1979] 2 Taxman 197 (SC)/[1979] 119 ITR 996 (SC)/[1979] 12 CTR 190 (SC)[31-08- 1979] held that the opinion on law rendered on the basis of audit report cannot be the basis for re-assessment rather it has to be the Ld. AO who should apply his mind not merely on the information by external agency but by evaluation of law, else it could lead to grave consequence of the external agencies ta…

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NTPC LTD

ITA/113/2026HC Delhi09 Feb 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 80

…ame cannot be a reason to initiate re-assessment proceedings. 14. Mr. Kantoor learned counsel for the respondent-assessee relied upon the following judgments in support of his submissions : i. Indian And Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT reported in (1979) 119 ITR 996. ii. FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Efunds international India Pvt. Ltd.) v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (2018) 408 ITR 75 (Del). iii. Jal Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income Tax reported in 2009 (5) TMI 24 – Delhi High Court. iv. Deepak Kapoor v. Principal Commissioner of…

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4, NEW DELHI vs. M/S NTPC LTD

ITA/82/2026HC Delhi09 Feb 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260ASection 80

…ame cannot be a reason to initiate re-assessment proceedings. 14. Mr. Kantoor learned counsel for the respondent-assessee relied upon the following judgments in support of his submissions : i. Indian And Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT reported in (1979) 119 ITR 996. ii. FIS Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Efunds international India Pvt. Ltd.) v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax reported in (2018) 408 ITR 75 (Del). iii. Jal Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Assistant Director of Income Tax reported in 2009 (5) TMI 24 – Delhi High Court. iv. Deepak Kapoor v. Principal Commissioner of…

PANKAJ JINDAL CONTRACTOR,MANSA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-I, BATHINDA, BATHINDA

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 695/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar05 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 695/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Pankaj Jindal Contractor, Vs. Dcit-Circle-1, Near Vidya Bharti School, Bathinda. Mansa. [Pan:-Aajfp8008L] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, Adv. Respondent By Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. Dr

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148aSection 250Section 282Section 40A(3)Section 68

…relating to cash payments above the permissible limits and such internal audit party information was valid in law. Furthermore, reference was also drawn to the decision of the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of Indian and Eastern Newspaper Society v CIT [1979]119 ITR 996 ( SC ) to submit that the internal audit party performs administrative functions and draws the attention of the AO to the applicable provisions and makes him aware of the same, and in the instant case he submitted , that is what has been, actually done, and there is nothing wrong in the same. 11.1 Thereafter, the Ld. DR further relied on the juri…

DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI vs. CDS INFRA PROJECTS LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of Revenue and cross-objection of Assessee are dismissed

ITA 1445/DEL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Cds Infra Projects Ltd., B-94, Tax, Circle 4(2), Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-Ii, New Delhi. New Delhi-110020 Pan :Aadcc0273D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(b)

…coupled with evidence led by assessee to discharge the burden against the presumption of correctness of entries recorded and seized material are not correct and assessee further relied on the following judgments: i). Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT 119 ITR 996 (SC); ii) Addl. CIT Vs. Jay Engg. Works Ltd. 113 ITR 389 (Del.); iii) S.S. Gadgil v. Lal & Co. 53 ITR 231 (SC); iv ) Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT 26 ITR 775 (SC); v ) Nokia India (P) Ltd. v. DDIT 59 taxmann.com 212, ITAT Delhi; vi) Hersh Win Chadha v DCIT 135 TTJ 513 ITAT Delhi; vii) GTC Industries Ltd. v. ACIT 65 ITD 380, ITAT Mumbai; ix…

NEETU HURKAT,PALI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 957/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Javed Khan, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Alpesh Parmar, CIT. DR
Section 10Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 263

…ly influenced by the existence of an audit objection. However, an\naudit objection, being only an expression of opinion by the audit wing, cannot\nconfer jurisdiction for revision. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian &\nEastern Newspaper Society v. CIT (1979) 119 ITR 996 (SC) held that an audit\nobjection constitutes mere opinion and cannot form the basis either for\nreopening an assessment or for revision under section 263. The same view\nhas been reiterated by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT v. Reliance\nCommunication Ltd. (2016) 69 taxmann.com 138 (Bom), holding that audit\nobjections do not empower the P…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 596/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLEU��, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 595/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2017-18

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ न्यायपीठ “ए”, चण्डीगढ़\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH\nHEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE\nश्री राजपाल यादव, उपाध्यक्ष एवं श्री कृणवन्त सहाय, लेखा सदस्य\nBEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM\n\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 588/Chd/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2014-15\nThe Haryana State Co-operative\nAgriculture and Rural Development\nBay No. 31-34, Sector 2, Panchkula\nस्थायी लेखा सं. / PAN NO: AAATT3989M\nअपीलार्थी/Appellant\nबनाम\nThe DCIT,\nCircle, Panchkula\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\n\nआयकर अपील सं. / ITA…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 594/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 593/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 592/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 591/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE,, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 590/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

Appeal is allowed

ITA 589/CHANDI/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: PHYSICAL MODE "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एवं "ी कृणव"त सहाय, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. RAJPALYADAV, VP &SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 588/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Haryana State Co-operative बनाम The DCIT, Agriculture and Rural Development Circle, Panchkula Bay No. 31-34, Sector 2 , Panchkula "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAATT3989M अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 590/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Har…

Showing 1–20 of 205 · Page 1 of 11

...
Indian & Eastern Newspaper Society v. CIT (119 ITR 996) — Cited in 205 Judgments | BharatTax