Rajshree Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others

457 ITR 354High Court2023#17945 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 341,001 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Judgments citing Rajshree Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others

S.P. Singla Construction Private Limited, Delhi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 514/CHANDI/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 Jan 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 153Section 153A

…red by various decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court including CIT Vs Foramer France (2003) 264 ITR 566 (S.C.). Further, ld. Counsel for the assessee also relied upon decision of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rajshree Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V UOI (2023) 457 ITR 354 (Bom). 10. On the other hand, the ld. CIT DR argued that the assessee has tried to argue that it had discharged the onus by filing confirmations or the copy of account of these parties but actually this has not been examined by the AO while completing original assessment and merely filing of these documents will not help the assessee in disc…

Navjyoti Farming Private Limited, Belapur vs. ITO, Ward -3, Panvel

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1020/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

…for completion of assessment, such reopening of assessment is not valid. For the above proposition, he relied on the following decisions: (i) SABH Infrastructure Ltd. vs. ACIT (2017) 398 ITR 198 (Del) (ii) Rajshree Realtors (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India (2023) 457 ITR 354 (Bom) (iii) Teofilo Fernando Antonio Pinto vs. Union of India (2024) 464 ITR 249 (Bom) Vibrant Securities (P.) Ltd. vs. ITO (2024) 465 ITR 531 (Bom) (iv) 5 7. In his next plank of argument, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee referring to the copy of reasons recorded, placed at pages 511 to 516 of the paper book, submitted that the case of the asse…

Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt Ld, Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-14, Pune

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 923/PUN/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S. PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.No.923/PUN./2023 Assessment Years 2011-2012 Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., The DCIT, Circle-14, Level-4, Amar Avinash Aayakar Sadan, Bodhi Corporate Plaza, S.No.11, Tower, 548/2B, Salisbury 11/1 to 11/4, Plot No.D/2, Park, Gultekdi, Atur Bund Garden Road, Pune. vs. Sangtani Park, Lane No.1, PIN – 411 001 Pune – 411 037. PAN AADCK2683F Maharashtra. Maharashtra. (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A.No.924/PUN./2023 Assessment Year 2012-2013 Khed Economic…

Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(2), Pune

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 925/PUN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S. PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.No.923/PUN./2023 Assessment Years 2011-2012 Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., The DCIT, Circle-14, Level-4, Amar Avinash Aayakar Sadan, Bodhi Corporate Plaza, S.No.11, Tower, 548/2B, Salisbury 11/1 to 11/4, Plot No.D/2, Park, Gultekdi, Atur Bund Garden Road, Pune. vs. Sangtani Park, Lane No.1, PIN – 411 001 Pune – 411 037. PAN AADCK2683F Maharashtra. Maharashtra. (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A.No.924/PUN./2023 Assessment Year 2012-2013 Khed Economic…

Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(1), Pune

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 924/PUN/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S. PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.No.923/PUN./2023 Assessment Years 2011-2012 Khed Economic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., The DCIT, Circle-14, Level-4, Amar Avinash Aayakar Sadan, Bodhi Corporate Plaza, S.No.11, Tower, 548/2B, Salisbury 11/1 to 11/4, Plot No.D/2, Park, Gultekdi, Atur Bund Garden Road, Pune. vs. Sangtani Park, Lane No.1, PIN – 411 001 Pune – 411 037. PAN AADCK2683F Maharashtra. Maharashtra. (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A.No.924/PUN./2023 Assessment Year 2012-2013 Khed Economic…

Rajshree Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others (457 ITR 354) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax