DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, RAJKOT vs. ADITYA BIRLA GLOBAL TRADING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (SWISS SINGAPORE INDIA PVT. LTD., GANDHIDHAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the charges levied were for late filing of bills of entry and not for infringement of law, thus compensatory in nature and allowable. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed, and one appeal by the assessee was allowed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of disallowance of penalty on custom duty and commission expenses paid to foreign agents. The assessee argued that the penalty was compensatory and for inadvertent delay, not a violation of law.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty on custom duty for late filing of bill of entry is compensatory and allowable as business expenditure. Whether commission expenses paid to foreign agents are disallowable due to non-deduction of TDS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sassoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT323 citing118 ITR 261 · 1979 · SC
- CIT v. Toshoku Ltd.270 citing125 ITR 525 · 1980 · SC
- CIT v. R.D. Aggarwal and Co.156 citing56 ITR 20 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Dhanrajgirji Raja Narasingirji154 citing91 ITR 544 · 1973 · SC
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motor Industries Company Limited64 citing223 ITR 112 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products Ltd.42 citing383 ITR 236 · 2016 · HC
- PCIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited29 citing99 Taxmann.com 154 · 2018 · HC
- CIT v. Angelique International Ltd.21 citing38 Taxmann.com 425 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- Srikakollu Subba Rao & Co. and Ors. v. Union of India and Other19 citing173 ITR 708 · 1988 · HC
- (i) CIT v. Model Exims Kanpur16 citing358 ITR 72 · 2013 · HC
- PCIT v. Jay Chemical Industries Ltd.15 citing120 Taxmann.com 315 · 2020 · HC
- Indian Aluminium Co. v. State of Kerala12 citing7 SCC 637 · 1996
- Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. v. ACIT10 citing68 SOT 403 · 2015 · ITAT
- Anant Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.8 citing2 SCC 175 · 1975
- CIT v. India Pistons Ltd.7 citing250 ITR 279 · 2001 · HC
- Hari Singh and Ors. v. The Military Estate Officer6 citing1 SCR 515 · 1973
- State of T.N v. Arooran Sugars Ltd.6 citing1 SCC 326 · 1997
- Dr. S. Reddappa v. Union of India5 citing232 ITR 62
- 37 Taxmann.com 3244 citing37 Taxmann.com 324
- Maharashtra v. Ranjit P4 citing9 SCC 358 · 2003
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.284 & 353/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Central Circle-2, Rajkot Trading (India) Private Limited (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, Rayson Arcade, Plot No.139, Sector 8, Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat (Appellant) (Respondent)
& आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.225 & 226/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2015-16 & 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Circle-1, Gandhidham (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private & Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, DCIT/ACIT Rayson Arcade, Plot Central-2, Rajkot No.139, Sector 8,
128- ITA Nos. 284, 353, 225 & 226/RJT/2024 Aditya Birla Global Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd. Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AATCS0544F (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Mehul Ranpura, AR Respondent by Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr.DR Date of Hearing
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026