PCIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited

99 Taxmann.com 154High Court2018#4085 most cited

What is PCIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited authority for?

A non-compete fee is an eligible business or commercial right for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, similar to copyrights and patents.

29

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited · Section 32(1)(ii) · non-compete fee · depreciation · business or commercial right · explanation to section 32(1)(ii)

Sections most often in play

Section 1961Section 37(1)Section 195Section 32(1)(ii)Section 40(a)(i)Section 43B(f)Section 68Section 69C

Issues it is cited on

depreciation on non-compete feesection 5(2)(b)non-compete feesection 10(2)(xv)section 43b(f)section 145(1)section 46mat creditsection 32(1)(ii)section 9(1)(i)section 5(2)income tax settlement commission

Judgments citing PCIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS "JRG SECURITIES LTD"),KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 243/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 242/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 241/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 240/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

M/S INDITRADE CAPITAL LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS ,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, CORPORATE WARD1(1),, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 239/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Sri.Aneesh Vishwanathan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 143(3)Section 32(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member ITA No.239/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2011-2012 ITA No.240/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2012-2013 ITA No.241/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2013-2014 ITA No.242/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2014-2015 ITA No.243/Coch/2023 :Asst.Year 2017-20128 M/s.Inditrade Capital Limited The Assistant Commissioner (formerly known as JRG v. of Income-tax, Cir.1(2) Securities Limited) Kochi. / 2nd Floor, MES Building Income Tax Officer Kaloor S.O., Ernakulam-682 017. Corp.Ward (1(1) PAN : AAACJ7327G. Kochi. (Appel…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, RAJKOT vs. ADITYA BIRLA GLOBAL TRADING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (SWISS SINGAPORE INDIA PVT. LTD., GANDHIDHAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA No

ITA 353/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 37(1)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.284 & 353/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) DCIT Vs. Aditya Birla Global Central Circle-2, Rajkot Trading (India) Private Limited (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, Rayson Arcade, Plot No.139, Sector 8, Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat (Appellant) (Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.225 & 226/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2015-16 & 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearin…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 , RAJKOT vs. ADITYA BIRLA GLOBAL TRADING(INDIA) PVT.LTD. (SWISS SINGAPORE INDIA PVT. LTD.), GANDHIDHAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA No

ITA 284/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 37(1)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.284 & 353/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) DCIT Vs. Aditya Birla Global Central Circle-2, Rajkot Trading (India) Private Limited (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, Rayson Arcade, Plot No.139, Sector 8, Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat (Appellant) (Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.225 & 226/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2015-16 & 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearin…

ADITYA BIRLA GLOBAL TRADING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,GUJARAT vs. DCIT-ACIT CENT-2 RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA No

ITA 226/RJT/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Feb 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 37(1)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.284 & 353/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) DCIT Vs. Aditya Birla Global Central Circle-2, Rajkot Trading (India) Private Limited (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, Rayson Arcade, Plot No.139, Sector 8, Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat (Appellant) (Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.225 & 226/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2015-16 & 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearin…

ADITYA BIRLA GLOBAL TRADING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,GUJARAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, GANDHIHDAM, GANDHIDHAM, GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, in ITA No

ITA 225/RJT/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Feb 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 37(1)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.284 & 353/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) DCIT Vs. Aditya Birla Global Central Circle-2, Rajkot Trading (India) Private Limited (Earlier known as Swiss Singapore India Private Limited) Unit 204-205, 1st Floor, Rayson Arcade, Plot No.139, Sector 8, Gandhidham S.O., Kachchh, Gujarat 370201, Gujarat (Appellant) (Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.225 & 226/RJT/2024 Assessment Years: (2015-16 & 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearin…

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8(2)(1), MUMBAI, AYAKAR BHAVAN vs. PIRAMAL GLASS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1232/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan () Assessment Year: 2021-22 Asst. Cit-8(2)(1), Piramal Glass Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 481, Aayakar Bhavan, 6Th Floor, Piramal Tower Annexe Maharishi Karve Road, Vs. Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Mumbai-400020. Parel, Mumbai-400013. Pan No. Aabcg 0093 R Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Ronak Doshi &
Section 36(1)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2021-22 Asst. CIT-8(2)(1), Piramal Glass Pvt. Ltd., Room No. 481, Aayakar Bhavan, 6th floor, Piramal Tower Annexe Maharishi Karve Road, Vs. Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Mumbai-400020. Parel, Mumbai-400013. PAN NO. AABCG 0093 R Appellant Respondent : Mr. Ronak Doshi & Assessee by Mr. Priyank Gala Revenue by : Mr. Suresh Gaikwad, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 13/08/2024 Date of pronouncement : 27/09/2024 ORDER PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM This appeal b…

SAMKEET ARYA HOMES LLP,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 249/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokarassessment Year: 2018-10

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 37

…ITA No.249/Ahd/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Page 1 of 7 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-10 Samkeet Arya Homes LLP, The Income Tax Officer, B-604, Shapath IV, Ward – 3(3)(5), Opp. Karnavati Club, Ahmedabad. S.G. Highway, Vs. Ahmedabad – 380 015. [PAN – ACRFS 2181 D] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Shrunjal Shah, AR Revenue by Shri N.J. Vyas, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 16.05.2024 Date of Pronouncement 16.07.2024 O R D E R PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE: This a…

ASST CIT CIRCLE- 7 (3)(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S PIRAMAL GLASS LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 8060/MUM/2019[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri M. Balaganeshआअसं. 8060/मुं/2019 ("न.व. 2003-04) Cit, Circle 7(3)(2), Room No.128A, 1St Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400 020 ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. M/S. Piramal Glass Ltd. (Earlier Known As Gujarat Glass Pvt. Ltd.) 1 Piramal Towerannexe, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013. Pan: Aabcg-0093-R ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri Minlind Chavan ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Shri Ronak Doshi सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 13/05/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05 /08/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Mumbai [In Short ‘The Cit(A)] Dated 22/10/2019 For The Assessment Year 2003-04. 2. Shri Ronak Doshi Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Submitted At The Outset That Revenue In Appeal Has Raised Eight Effective Grounds. Majority Of The Grounds Raised In Appeal By Revenue Are Either Covered By The Order Of 2 Tribunal In Assessee’S Own Case In Ita No.9645/Mum/2004 For Assessment Year 2001-02 Decided On 02/08/2016 Or By The Order Of Hon'Ble Bombay High Court In The Case Of Assessee Titled Pcit Vs. Piramal Glass Ltd. In Income Tax Appeal No.556 Of 2017 Decided On 11/06/2019. 3. Per Contra, Shri Minlind Chavan Representing The Department Vehemently Defending The Assessment Order Prayed For Reversing The Findings Of Cit(A) & Upholding The Additions Made In The Assessment Order. However, Ld. Departmental Representative Fairly Stated That Substantial Issues Raised In The Appeal Have Been Considered By The Tribunal In Assessee’S Own Case For Preceding Assessment Years.

For Appellant: Shri Minlind ChavanFor Respondent: Shri Ronak Doshi
Section 32Section 36(1)(iii)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण मुंबई पीठ “ सी ” "ी "वकास अव"थी, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एम बालगणेश, लेखाकार सद"य के सम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “C ”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं. 8060/मुं/2019 ("न.व. 2003-04) CIT, Circle 7(3)(2), Room No.128A, 1st Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Mumbai - 400 020 ...... अपीलाथ" /Appellant बनाम Vs. M/s. Piramal Glass Ltd. (Earlier known as Gujarat Glass Pvt. Ltd.) 1 Piramal TowerAnnexe, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013. PAN: AABCG-0093-R ..... ""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant…

M/S ARKEMA PEROXIDES INDIA LTD.,CHENNAI vs. THE ASSTT. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CORPORATE CIRCLE1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 897/CHNY/2020[2016-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Jul 2022AY 2016-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate
Section 32(1)(ii)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘सी ’ "याय पीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी. दुगा" राव, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम$ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 897/Chny/ 2020 ("नधा"रणवष" /Assessment Year: 2016-17) M/s.Arkema Peroxides India Pvt.Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of 1st floor, Balmer Laurie House, Income Tax 628, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Corporate Circle-1(1) Chennai-18. Chennai. PAN: AAACE 1713F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant by : Mr. R.Vijayaraghavan,…

CAVINKARE PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1598/CHNY/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1597 & 1598/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2005-06 & 2006-07 M/S.Cavinkare Private The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, V. Income Tax, No. 12, Cenotaph Road, Central Circle 2(1), Teynampet, Chennai. Chennai – 600 018. Pan: Aaacb 3754B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri T. Banusekar, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Smt. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 28.09.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2021

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(22)(e)Section 35

…nd patents rather to strengthen the commercial right, which was transferred in favour of the assessee. A similar view has been taken by a Hon’ble :-13-: ITA. Nos: 1597 & 1598/Chny/2018 Bombay High Court in the PCIT vs Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt Ltd, 2018, 99 Taxmann.com 154, where it has considered identical issue and held that non-compete fee is in the nature of any other business or commercial right of similar nature used in explanation to section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and thus, eligible for depreciation. As regard the case laws cited by the Ld. DR in the case of Sharp Business System s CIT 492/2012, althoug…

CAVINKARE PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1597/CHNY/2018[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1597 & 1598/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2005-06 & 2006-07 M/S.Cavinkare Private The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, V. Income Tax, No. 12, Cenotaph Road, Central Circle 2(1), Teynampet, Chennai. Chennai – 600 018. Pan: Aaacb 3754B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri T. Banusekar, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Smt. R. Anita, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 28.09.2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2021

For Appellant: Shri T. Banusekar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. R. Anita, Addl. CIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2(22)(e)Section 35

…nd patents rather to strengthen the commercial right, which was transferred in favour of the assessee. A similar view has been taken by a Hon’ble :-13-: ITA. Nos: 1597 & 1598/Chny/2018 Bombay High Court in the PCIT vs Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt Ltd, 2018, 99 Taxmann.com 154, where it has considered identical issue and held that non-compete fee is in the nature of any other business or commercial right of similar nature used in explanation to section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and thus, eligible for depreciation. As regard the case laws cited by the Ld. DR in the case of Sharp Business System s CIT 492/2012, althoug…

DCIT 8(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SHAMROCK PHARMACHEMI P. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, both appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 862/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M.Balaganeshita Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 (Assessment Years :2013-14 & 2014-15) Dcit-8(2)(1) Vs. M/S. Shamrock Pharmachemi Room No.624, Pvt.Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road Off Dr. E Moses Road Mumbai-400 020 Worli, Mumbai-400 025 Pan/Gir No.Aaacs6290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Bharat Gandhi, Ar Revenue By Shri V.Vinod Kumar, Sr.Ar Date Of Hearing 28/10/2020 Date Of Pronouncement 11/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per M. Balaganesh (A.M): These Two Appeals Filed By Revenue In Ita Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 For Assessment Years (Ay) 2013-14 & 2014-15 Arise Out Of The Order By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 14, Mumbai In Appeals No.Cit(A)-14/It-170/15-16 & Cit(A)-14/It- 119/16-17, Dated 27/11/2017 (Ld. Cit(A) In Short) Against The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As Act) Dated 31/08/2016 By The Ld. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-8(2)(1), Mumbai (Hereinafter Referred To As Ld. Ao).

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT), ”G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 862 & 863/Mum/2018 (Assessment Years :2013-14 & 2014-15) DCIT-8(2)(1) Vs. M/s. Shamrock Pharmachemi Room No.624, Pvt.Ltd. Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road Off Dr. E Moses Road Mumbai-400 020 Worli, Mumbai-400 025 PAN/GIR No.AAACS6290H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Bharat Gandhi, AR Revenue by Shri V.Vinod Kumar, Sr.AR Date of Hearing 28/10/2020 Date of Pronouncement 11/11/2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): These two appeals filed b…

ACIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. M/S HAVELLS INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 466/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishihavells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi Cr Building Ip Estate, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Ltu, Nbcc Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit (Ltu), Vs. Havells India Ltd, Nbcc Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0351E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 14ASection 80H

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ―C‖: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi CR Building IP Estate, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, LTU, NBCC Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT (LTU), Vs. Havells India Ltd, NBCC Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi PAN: AAACH…

M/S HAVELLS INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6073/DEL/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishihavells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi Cr Building Ip Estate, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Ltu, Nbcc Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit (Ltu), Vs. Havells India Ltd, Nbcc Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0351E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 14ASection 80H

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ―C‖: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi CR Building IP Estate, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, LTU, NBCC Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT (LTU), Vs. Havells India Ltd, NBCC Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi PAN: AAACH…

M/S HAVELLS INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6072/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Aug 2020AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishihavells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi Cr Building Ip Estate, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Ltu, Nbcc Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, Pan: Aaach0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit (Ltu), Vs. Havells India Ltd, Nbcc Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0351E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 14ASection 80H

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ―C‖: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, Circle-12(1), Civil Lines, New Delhi CR Building IP Estate, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Havells India Ltd, Vs. DCIT, 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, LTU, NBCC Plaza, Civil Lines, New Delhi Pusp Vihar, Sector-4, Saket, PAN: AAACH0351E New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) ACIT (LTU), Vs. Havells India Ltd, NBCC Plaza, Pusp Vihar, Sector- 1/7 Ram Kishore Road, 4, Saket, New Delhi Civil Lines, New Delhi PAN: AAACH…

DCIT LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S SUNDARAM ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee(ITA no

ITA 468/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Oct 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr.Raghavan RamabadranFor Respondent: Dr. M.Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 40

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी र"मत कोचर, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.419 to 422/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2011-12 to 2014-15 v. M/s.Sundaram Asset Management- The Deputy Commissioner Company Ltd. (Formerly Sundaram of Income Tax, BNP Paribas Asset Management Co. Large Tax Payer Unit-1, Ltd),Sundaram Towers, II Floor, Chennai. No.46, Whites Road, Chennai-600 034. [PAN: AAICS 4257 J] (अपीलाथ"/Appella…

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

PCIT v. Ferromatic Milacron India Private Limited (99 Taxmann.com 154) — Cited in 29 Judgments | BharatTax