DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), CHENNAI vs. KERRY RELIABLE LOGISTICS P LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, appeals with a tax effect below ₹50 lakhs should not be filed. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15. The tax effect in all these appeals was less than ₹50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit by CBDT are maintainable before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY]
आदेश / O R D E R PER INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER These are appeals filed by the Revenue directed against common order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax to 1956 /2018 :- 2 -:
(Appeals)-18, Chennai, dated 05.03.2018 for the assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-2015.
It is stated before us that the tax effect in all these cases 2. are less than �50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec. 268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of the reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed � 50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus taking a note of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeals are less than �50 lakhs, the present appeals deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeals are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeals fall in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the to 1956 /2018 :- 3 -: light of CBDT circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed.
Order pronounced on 15th day of October 2019, at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 268A(1)
- DCIT., Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad vs C K Entertainments Private Limited…ITA 967/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Heard7 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
- DCIT., Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad vs C K Entertainments Private Limited…ITA 964/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Heard7 Nov 2025AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central… vs Radhakrishnan Nair Parameswaran Pillai…ITA 535/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
- Assistnat Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS… vs English House, KozhikodeITA 722/COCH/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed27 Mar 2025AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Jalgaon vs Amrut Nana Chaudhari, JalgaonITA 317/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026