INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), JALGAON, JALGAON vs. AMRUT NANA CHAUDHARI, JALGAON

This appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi for the assessment year 2016-17.

It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.60 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 5 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.60 lakhs, appeals should not be filed. And vide para 5 of the said circular (supra) it is also stated that in cases where the tax effect in the pending appeals before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.60 lakhs, appeals should be withdrawn. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is admittedly less than Rs.60 lakhs, therefore, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling of the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.09/2024 dated 17/09/2024, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.