ASSISTNAT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, KOZHIKODE vs. ENGLISH HOUSE, KOZHIKODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal, citing CBDT Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, which mandates that the Revenue should not file appeals before the ITAT if the tax effect is below Rs. 60 lakhs. The Tribunal clarified that the issues raised are left open for appropriate future proceedings, and the Revenue may apply for recall if the appeal falls under any exceptions to the circular.
What were the facts?
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), TDS Circle, filed an appeal against an order of the Addl/Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 for Assessment Year 2020-21. The tax effect involved in this appeal was less than Rs. 60 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether a Revenue appeal with a tax effect below Rs. 60 lakhs should be dismissed as per CBDT Circular No. 9/2024, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JM
O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Addl/Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Delhi [CIT(A)], dated 01.07.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21.
During the course of hearing it is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.60 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under ACIT, TDS Circle Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 2 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.60 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.60 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, the appeal dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 27th March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 268A(1)
- DCIT., Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad vs C K Entertainments Private Limited…ITA 967/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Heard7 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
- DCIT., Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad vs C K Entertainments Private Limited…ITA 964/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Heard7 Nov 2025AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central… vs Radhakrishnan Nair Parameswaran Pillai…ITA 535/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3), Jalgaon vs Amrut Nana Chaudhari, JalgaonITA 317/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Stephen Pathickal Kurian, Veliyannoor…ITA 638/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed29 Jan 2025AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026