DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU vs. MANIPAL EDUCATION AND MEDICAL GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 14A was not sustainable as the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record the necessary satisfaction regarding the assessee's claim of not incurring expenditure for earning exempt income, and the subsequent addition made by the AO on account of slump sale consideration was also deleted as it was based on the stamp duty value and not the actual consideration received.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, M/s. Manipal Education and Medical Group India Pvt. Ltd., filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s order, which upheld a disallowance under Section 14A of Rs. 75,84,440 and deleted an addition of Rs. 4,44,80,000. The disallowance was related to expenditure incurred for earning exempt income, and the addition was related to the slump sale consideration.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the disallowance under Section 14A is sustainable without proper satisfaction from the AO. 2. Whether the slump sale consideration was correctly determined by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing402 ITR 640 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing189 Taxmann 50 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Ld. PCIT v. Vedanta Limited14 citing102 Taxmann.com 95 · 2019 · HC
- 278 Taxmann 2667 citing278 Taxmann 266 · 2021 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President
Cross appeals are filed in case of M/s. Manipal Education and Medical Group India Pvt. Ltd., (the assessee/appellant) against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax-15, Bangalore [learned CIT(A)] on 24.07.2025 wherein the Assessment Orde
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026