Section 50B of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 50B is CIT v. Artex Manufacturing Co. (227 ITR 260), cited in 36 of the 40 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 50B
CIT v. Artex Manufacturing Co.
227 ITR 260 · 1997 · Supreme Court
36
citing judgments
In a slump sale, the slump purchase price cannot be apportioned among individual assets for claiming depreciation, as there is no indication of the price attributable to specific assets out of the total sale consideration.
CIT v. Mugneeram Bangur & Corn. (Land Department)
57 ITR 299 · 1965 · Supreme Court
21
citing judgments
TUV India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
110 Taxmann.com 175 · 2019 · ITAT
19
citing judgments
Ld. PCIT v. Vedanta Limited
102 Taxmann.com 95 · 2019 · High Court
14
citing judgments
M/s. EDAC Engineering Limited v. DCIT
141 ITD 231 · ITAT
9
citing judgments
Judgments on Section 50B
Showing 1–20 of 40 · Page 1 of 2