THE THIMIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,KASARAGOD vs. ITO WARD, KASARAGOD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant is a primary agricultural society without a banking license, and thus not a co-operative bank. Therefore, the provisions of Section 80P(4) are not applicable. Citing the Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction under Section 80P.
What were the facts?
The appellant, a co-operative society accepting deposits and providing credit, filed a return in response to a Section 148 notice, claiming a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Assessing Officer denied this deduction, asserting the society was not a primary agricultural credit society, a decision upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the appellant co-operative society is eligible to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139(1),Section 148,Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 80P(4),Section 80P
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM
Assessment Year: 2009-10 The Thimiri Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant Nhanumaki, Chervathur, Kasaragod 671313 [PAN: AABAT0462H] vs. The Income Tax Officer, WD-2, Kasaragod .......... Respondent Assessee by: ------- None ------- Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 04.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025 O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 20.08.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10.
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a co-operative society registered under the Kerala State Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. It is engaged in the business of accepting deposits from members and providing credit facilities to members. The appellant had not filed regular return of income under the provisions of section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). a notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee on 30.10.2015. In response The Thimiri Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. to the notice the appellant filed the return of income on 08.12.2016 declaring total income as Nil after claiming deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of Rs. 29,36,867/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Kasaragod vide order dated 28.12.2017 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act at total income of Rs. 29,38,867/-. While doing so, the AO denied deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) by holding that the appellant society is not a primary agriculture credit society.
Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.
Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal.
When the appeal was called on nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing. Therefore, I proceeded to dispose of the appeal after hearing the learned Sr. DR.
The issue that arose for my consideration is whether the appellant co-operative society is eligible to claim deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act or not. The undisputed facts of the case are that the appellant is a co-operative society formed with the object of accepting deposits from members and providing credit facilities to the members. It is classified as a primary agricultural society. It does not enjoy any banking licence to carry on the business of banking from Reserve Bank of India. Therefore, in the given circumstances it The Thimiri Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. cannot be classified as a co-operative bank and not hit by provisions of subsection (4) of section 80P of the Act. The ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co- operative Bank Ltd. (supra) is clearly applicable to the facts of the case. In the circumstances, I direct the AO to allow the claim for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19th November, 2025.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026