DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the assessee's activities were not primarily profit-oriented and that the revenue from non-core activities was negligible. The Tribunal followed its own previous decision in the assessee's own case regarding the cancellation of registration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a government company implementing railway infrastructure projects, had its registration under Section 12AA cancelled. The Assessing Officer denied exemption under Section 11 due to the cancellation and the proviso to Section 2(15) regarding business receipts exceeding limits.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 in light of the proviso to Section 2(15) and the cancellation of its registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 2(15),Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 12AA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association328 citing121 ITR 1 · 1980 · SC
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce167 citing55 ITR 722 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka123 citing1 SCC 574 · 1996
- American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute v. CBDT111 citing301 ITR 86 · 2008 · SC
- Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. ACIT108 citing396 ITR 323 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation102 citing159 ITR 1 · 1986 · SC
- CIT v. Gujarat Maritime Board98 citing166 Taxmann 58 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Sarwar Agency P. Ltd.95 citing397 ITR 400 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association82 citing140 ITR 1 · 1983 · SC
- T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka81 citing8 SCC 481 · 2002
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) v. DGIT (Exemptions)80 citing358 ITR 91 · 2013 · HC
- Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Sai Publication Fund62 citing258 ITR 70 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- Gujarat State Co-operative Union v. CIT58 citing195 ITR 279 · 1992 · HC
- Bihar Institute of Mining & Mine Surveying v. CIT57 citing208 ITR 608 · 1994 · HC
- Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations v. DGIT(E)37 citing362 ITR 436 · 2014 · HC
- DIT(E) v. Ahmedabad Management Association37 citing47 Taxmann.com 162 · 2014 · HC
- Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. ACIT(E)35 citing83 Taxmann.com 78 · 2017 · HC
- Jalandhar Development Authority v. CIT34 citing35 SOT 15 · 2010 · ITAT
- Bureau of India Standard v. DGIT (Exemptions)30 citing212 Taxmann 210 · 2013 · HC
- 1. CIT v. International Tractor Ltd.23 citing397 ITR 696 · HC
- CST v. Sai Publication Fund21 citing122 Taxmann 437 · 2002 · HC
- Indian Institute of Bankers v. DCIT (Exemption)21 citing74 TTJ 523 · 2002 · ITAT
- 15 citing
- Punjab Urban Planning and Area Development Authority v. CIT14 citing156 Taxmann 37 · 2006
- Jammu Development Authority v. UOI12 citing52 SOT 153 · ITAT
- 28 Taxmann.com 2187 citing28 Taxmann.com 218
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. Abdul Bakhi and Bros.6 citing5 STC 644 · 1964 · SC
- Bombay Presidency Golf Club Ltd. v. ITO5 citing159 ITD 1050 · 2016 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income-tax, Jaipur II v. Jaipur Stock Exchange Ltd.4 citing79 Taxmann.com 388 · 2017
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / Concerned CIT िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�यािपत �ित //True Copy// 1. उप/सहायक पंजीकार ( Asst. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Mumbai 62 Mumbai Railway Vikas Corpn, Ltd., Mumbai 63 Mumbai Railway Vikas Corpn, Ltd., Mumbai 64 Mumbai Railway Vikas Corpn, Ltd., Mumbai
Other Member… on which the
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026