1. CIT v. International Tractor Ltd.

397 ITR 696High Court#5136 most cited

What is 1. CIT v. International Tractor Ltd. authority for?

Deductions claimed under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are allowable if the assessing officer has allowed similar claims.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. International Tractor Ltd. · Section 80IC · deduction · assessing officer · similar claims · income tax

Sections most often in play

Section 11Section 12Section 13(8)Section 2(15)

Issues it is cited on

section 80ib(2)section 2(29ba)section 35acpreliminary expensesfirst proviso to section 147section 151(1)infrastructure facilitybeyond four yearsmaterial facts necessary for assessmentsection 80icsection 80ibkelvinator

Judgments citing 1. CIT v. International Tractor Ltd.

DCIT(E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. SRI SHANMUKHANANDA FINE ARTS & SANGEETHA SABHA, MUMBAI

In the result, both appeals filed by assessee Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 9385/MUM/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Apr 2026

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Jagadish ()

Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 260A

…of res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But, at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon’ble Delhi High Court(397 ITR 696)has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd.(397 ITR 400) has held as under: “In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unles…

DCIT(E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. SRI SHANMUKHANANDA FINE ARTS & SANGEETHA SABHA, MUMBAI

In the result, both appeals filed by assessee Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 9384/MUM/2025[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Apr 2026

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Jagadish ()

Section 11Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 260A

…of res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But, at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon’ble Delhi High Court(397 ITR 696)has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd.(397 ITR 400) has held as under: “In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unles…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 1, BHOPAL , BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 510/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 5(1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 509/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -5(1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT. LTD., BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 508/IND/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

MS MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD,BHOPAL vs. ACIT 2 (1) BHOPAL, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 489/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

MS MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD,BHOPAL vs. ACIT 2 (1) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 486/IND/2024[2012-13 ]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD ,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT -2- (1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 444/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

ACIT CIRCLE-2(I), BHOPAL vs. MAPAAEX REMEDIES (P) LTD., BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 214/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year 2014-15 Acit, Circle -2(1) Mapaaex Remedies Pvt. Ltd. Bhopal Hig-500, E-7, Arera Colony, Bhopal Vs. (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Pan No. Aaecm 2274 P Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Revenue By Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv & Gagan Tiwari, Adv. Date Of Hearing 17.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 26.12.2022

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80I

…under section 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC of the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) Page 9 of 13 Mapaaex Remedies Pvt. Ltd. Assessment year 2014-15 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other…

M/S. VIMONI INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed, as indicated above

ITA 1510/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 43BSection 80I

…ection 80IC of the Act, has allowed. Thus, he submitted, deduction claimed under section 80IC off the Act should be allowed. In support of such contention, learned counsel relied upon the following decisions: 6 1. CIT Vs. International Tractor Ltd. {2017} 397 ITR 696 (Delhi High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Tata Communications Interned Services Ltd. [2012] 251 CTR 290 (Delhi High Court) 3. CIT Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd. [2013] 355 ITR 14 (Delhi High Court) 4. M/s. Hughes Communications India Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITA No.2346/Del/2014 along with other appeals, dated 14.09.2021) 5. Shree Veer Aromatics Herbs Products V…

DCIT(E)-2(1), MUMBAI vs. NEHRU CENTRE, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 7461/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Bledcit (E) – 2(1) V. Nehru Centre Room No. 519, 5Th Floor Discovery Of India Building Piramal Chambers, Lalbaug 13Th Floor, Dr. Annie Besant Road Worli, Mumbai - 400018 Mumbai – 400 012 Pan: Aaatn2536J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Dilip Thakkar Department By : Shri Dilipkumar Shah

For Appellant: Shri Dilip ThakkarFor Respondent: Shri Dilipkumar Shah
Section 11Section 143(2)Section 2(15)

…f res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But, at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon'ble Delhi High Court (397 ITR 696) has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd. (397 ITR 400) has held as under: In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unle…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the Four appeals filed by the revenue and four cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2877/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri T. Kipgan, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 617

…of res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon'ble Delhi High Court(397 ITR 696)has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd.(397 ITR 400) has held as under: "In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unle…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2883/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)

…CO No 45/Mum/20 ITA No. 2883/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2015-16 Page 1 of 38 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI 'D' BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Pavan Kumar Gadale (Judicial Member)] ITA No. 2883/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions 2(1), Mumbai ……………….………Appellant Vs. Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………………Respondent 2nd floor, Churchgate Station Building Churchgate, Mumbai 400 00 [PAN: AACCM1284B] CO No 45/Mum/20 In ITA No. 2883/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2015-16 Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………….…Cross objector 2nd floor, Church…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2881/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2013-14
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)

…CO No 43/Mum/20 ITA No. 2881/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2013-14 Page 1 of 38 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI 'D' BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Pavan Kumar Gadale (Judicial Member)] ITA No. 2881/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions 2(1), Mumbai ……………….………Appellant Vs. Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………………Respondent 2nd floor, Churchgate Station Building Churchgate, Mumbai 400 00 [PAN: AACCM1284B] CO No 43/Mum/20 In ITA No. 2881/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2013-14 Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………….…Cross objector 2nd floor, Churc…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2880/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2012-13
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)Section 617

…CO No 42/Mum/20 ITA No. 2880/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2012-13 Page 1 of 37 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI 'D' BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Pavan Kumar Gadale (Judicial Member)] ITA No. 2880/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions 2(1), Mumbai ……………….………Appellant Vs. Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………………Respondent 2nd floor, Churchgate Station Building Churchgate, Mumbai 400 00 [PAN: AACCM1284B] CO No 42/Mum/20 In ITA No. 2880/Mum/19 Assessment year: 2012-13 Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Limited ……………….…Cross objector 2nd floor, Churc…

ITO (E) 2(3), MUMBAI vs. SHANMUKHANANDA FINE ARTS & SANGEETHA SABHA, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2025/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Ram Lal Negi

For Appellant: Shri Paresh Shaparia, A.RFor Respondent: Shri T.S. Khalsa, D.R
Section 11Section 12A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.2025 & 2026/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14 Income Tax Officer M/s. Sri (Exemptions)-2(3), Shanmukhanand Fine Room No.513, 5th Floor, Arts and Sangeetha Piramal Chambers, Sabha, Income Tax Office, Plot No.292, Vs. Lalbaug, Shanmukhanand Hall, Parel, Mumbai – 400 012 Comrade Harbanslal Marg, Sion (East), Mumbai – 400 022 PAN: AAATS2694E (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : Shri Paresh Shaparia, A.R. Revenue by : Shri T.S. Khalsa, D.R. D…

THE FINE ARTS SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ITO (E) 2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are party allowed

ITA 189/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 2171/Mum/2016 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

…of res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But, at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon’ble Delhi High Court(397 ITR 696)has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd.(397 ITR 400) has held as under: In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unles…

THE FINE ARTS SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. DY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) - 1(2), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are party allowed

ITA 2171/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jul 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 2171/Mum/2016 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

…of res judicata are not applicable to the income tax proceedings. But, at the same time it is also true that principles of consistency have to be followed while deciding the tax matters. In the case of International tractors Ltd., the Hon’ble Delhi High Court(397 ITR 696)has held that deductions allowed in the earlier assessment years should not be withdrawn unless the circumstances have changed. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of Zazsons export Ltd.(397 ITR 400) has held as under: In order to maintain consistency, a view, which had been accepted in an earlier order ought not to be disturbed unles…

M/S. SHRM FOOD & ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ITO WD 8(3)(1),

ITA 596/MUM/2008[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 May 2018AY 2004-2005
For Appellant: Shri J.D. MistryFor Respondent: Shri V. Justin- DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 254(1)

…आयकर आयकर अपीलीय आयकर आयकर अपीलीय अपीलीय अिधकरण अपीलीय अिधकरण अिधकरण, मुंबई अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई “ ई” खंडपीठ मुंबई खंडपीठ खंडपीठ खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal -“E”Bench Mumbai सव"ी सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" सव"ी राजे"" राजे"",लेखा राजे"" लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं सद"य एवं एवं, संदीप एवं संदीप संदीप गोसांई संदीप गोसांई गोसांई, "याियक गोसांई "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य सद"य सद"य Before S/Shri Rajendra,Accountant Member and Sandeep Gosain,Judicial Member आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./596/Mum/2008,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2004-05 आयकर आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" SHRM Food…

DCIT 1(2)-2, MUMBAI vs. OZONELAND AGRO P.LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 4854/MUM/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 May 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Dr. K. Sivaram and Shri Rahul K. HakaniFor Respondent: Shri T.A. Khan-DR
Section 143Section 56

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, , , , मुंबई आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण मुंबई मुंबई “सी मुंबई सी सी” खंडपीठ सी खंडपीठ खंडपीठ मेमेमेमे खंडपीठ Income-tax Appellate Tribunal -“C”Bench Mumbai सव"ी सव"ी सव"ी राजे"" सव"ी राजे"" राजे"",लेखा राजे"" लेखा लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य सद"य एवं सद"य एवं एवं अमरजीत एवं अमरजीत अमरजीत "सह अमरजीत "सह "सह, "याियक "सह "याियक "याियक सद"य "याियक सद"य सद"य सद"य Before S/Sh.Rajendra,Accountant Member and Amarjit Singh,Judicial Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A./4854/Mum/2016,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" DCIT-1(2)-2 M/s. Ozoneland Agro Pv…

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2