Punjab Urban Planning and Area Development Authority v. CIT

156 Taxmann 37Reported decision2006#7700 most cited
14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2022.

Judgments citing Punjab Urban Planning and Area Development Authority v. CIT

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 24/LKW/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 23/LKW/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 211/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 210/LKW/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 165/LKW/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 164/LKW/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 631/LKW/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 630/LKW/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

…Page 1 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T. S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.630 & 631/Lkw/2016 Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.23 & 24/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2009-10 & 2010-11 I.T.A. No.164 & 165/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2011-12 & 2012-13 I.T.A. No.210 & 211/Lkw/2017 Assessment year:2013-14 & 2014-15 A.C.I.T. (Exemptions), Vs. M/s U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Lucknow. 104, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Lucknow. PAN:AAAJU0103A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri G. C. Sri…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, all the Four appeals filed by the revenue and four cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2877/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jan 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri T. Kipgan, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 25Section 617

…e case of Jammu Development Authority Vs. CIT (ITA No.30(Asr).201 1 (52 SOT 153) (b) Hon'ble ITAT Amritsar in the case of Jalandhar Development Authority Vs. CIT (35 SOT 15). (c) Chandigarh Bench in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (156 Taxmann 37). (d) Goa Industrial Development Corporation Vs. CIT, Panaji dated 22.0o6.2012. (e) ITAT Cochin Bench in the case of Greater Cochin Development Authority Vs. Jt, DIT(OSD)(E), Range-4, Kochi. (fi ADIT(E), Trivandrum Vs. Kerala Industrial Development Corporation (2015) (54 taxmann.com 11 0)(Cochin Truib). 4. "Whether on the facts and circumstan…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2883/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2015-16
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)

…he case of Jammu Development Authority Vs. CIT (ITA No.30(Asr).2011 (52 SOT 153) (b) Hon'ble ITAT Amritsar in the case of Jalandhar Development Authority Vs. CIT (35 SOT 15). (c) Chandigarh Bench in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (156 Taxmann 37). (d) Goa Industrial Development Corporation Vs. CIT, Panaji dated 22.06.2012. (e) ITAT Cochin Bench in the case of Greater Cochin Development Authority Vs. Jt. DIT(OSD)(E), Range-4, Kochi. (f) ADIT(E), Trivandrum Vs. Kerala Industrial Development Corporation (2015) (54 taxmann.com 110)(Cochin Truib). 4. "Whether on the facts and circumstances…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2881/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2013-14
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)

…he case of Jammu Development Authority Vs. CIT (ITA No.30(Asr).2011 (52 SOT 153) (b) Hon'ble ITAT Amritsar in the case of Jalandhar Development Authority Vs. CIT (35 SOT 15). (c) Chandigarh Bench in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (156 Taxmann 37). (d) Goa Industrial Development Corporation Vs. CIT, Panaji dated 22.06.2012. (e) ITAT Cochin Bench in the case of Greater Cochin Development Authority Vs. Jt. DIT(OSD)(E), Range-4, Kochi. (f) ADIT(E), Trivandrum Vs. Kerala Industrial Development Corporation (2015) (54 taxmann.com 110)(Cochin Truib). 4. "Whether on the facts and circumstances…

DCIT (E) 2(1), MUMBAI vs. MUMBAI RAILWAY VIKAS CORPN LTD, MUMBAI

ITA 2880/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2021AY 2012-13
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 2(25)Section 617

…he case of Jammu Development Authority Vs. CIT (ITA No.30(Asr).2011 (52 SOT 153) (b) Hon'ble ITAT Amritsar in the case of Jalandhar Development Authority Vs. CIT (35 SOT 15). (c) Chandigarh Bench in the case of Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (156 Taxmann 37). (d) Goa Industrial Development Corporation Vs. CIT, Panaji dated 22.06.2012. (e) ITAT Cochin Bench in the case of Greater Cochin Development Authority Vs. Jt. DIT(OSD)(E), Range-4, Kochi. (f) ADIT(E), Trivandrum Vs. Kerala Industrial Development Corporation (2015) (54 taxmann.com 110)(Cochin Truib). 4. "Whether on the facts and circumstances…

GUJARAT HOUSING BOARD (GHB),,AHMEDABAD vs. THE D.C.I.T. (EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 3297/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Him) Of Denying Exemption To The Appellant’S Income U/S.11 & 12 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 As Claimed In The Appellant’S Return, On The Ground That The Appellant’S Case Attracted The First Proviso To Section 2(15) & In Turn, Sub-Section(8) Of Section 13 Of The Act.

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 13Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

…ITA No. 3297/Ahd/2016 Gujarat Housing Board Vs. DCIT (Exemption) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD ‘D’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD [Coram: Justice P P Bhatt, President and Pramod Kumar, Vice President] Assessment Year: 2012-13 Gujarat Housing Board (GHB) ................…………...........Appellant Pragtinagar, Naranpura, Ahmedabad-380 013 [PAN : AAALG 0206 E] Vs. DCIT (Exemption) ...................................... Respondent Circle-1, Ahmedabad Appearances by: Vijay Ranjan, for the appellant Anshu Prakash, for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing : 31.10.2018 D…

BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 329/CTK/2013[]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 May 2017

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadalebhubaneswar Development Vs. Cit, Bhubaneswar. Authority, Akash Shova Building, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. Aaalb 0073 G (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/R.K.Kar, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohapatra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 77

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Bhubaneswar Development Vs. CIT, Bhubaneswar. Authority, Akash shova Building, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar. PAN/GIR No. AAALB 0073 G (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.Naik/R.K.Kar, AR Revenue by : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 22/05/ 2017 Date of Pronouncement : 26 /05/ 2017 O R D E R Per N.S.Saini, AM This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT, Bhubaneswar, dated 8.3.2013. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhu…

Punjab Urban Planning and Area Development Authority v. CIT (156 Taxmann 37) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax