DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA vs. M/S AFI AGRO PVT. LTD., KHANNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 153D was mechanical and without proper application of mind, as evidenced by the approval of multiple assessment orders in a common format without specific consideration of each case's details. Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed.
What were the facts?
A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on the assessee, AFI Agro Private Limited. Subsequently, assessment orders were passed under Section 153A read with Section 143(3). The assessee challenged these orders, arguing that the approval granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 153D was mechanical and lacked application of mind.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 153D for assessment orders passed under Section 153A was valid, or if it was granted mechanically without due application of mind.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing380 ITR 573 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
- CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.1,823 citing374 ITR 645 · 2015 · HC
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing166 Taxmann.com 327 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing147 Taxmann.com 288 · 2023 · HC
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing454 ITR 312 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
- 21. In SB Gurbaksh Singh v. Union of India318 citing2 SCC 181 · 2007 · SC
- Rishabchand Bhansali v. Dy. CIT202 citing267 ITR 577 · 2004 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Subodh Agarwal194 citing149 Taxmann.com 373 · 2023 · HC
- 176 citing
- PCIT v. Sidharth Gupta157 citing450 ITR 534 · 2023 · HC
- PCIT v. Anuj Bansal147 citing466 ITR 254 · 2024 · SC
- Sakthivel Bankers v. Asstt. CIT132 citing124 Taxmann 227 · 2002
- Director, ECIL v. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC 727; Haryana Financial Corporation v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja93 citing3 SCC 364 · 1996
- Smt. Shreelekha Damani v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD-1), CR-7, Mumbai86 citing88 Taxmann.com 383 · 2017
- Kailash Moudgil v. DCIT79 citing72 ITD 97 · 2000 · ITAT
- Gayathri Textiles v. CIT69 citing111 Taxmann 123 · 2000 · HC
- Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. v. ACIT65 citing68 ITD 148 · 1999 · ITAT
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India62 citing4 SCC 379 · 1980
- Gopal S. Pandit v. CIT56 citing96 Taxmann.com 233 · 2018 · HC
- Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise Gauhati (2015) 8 SCC 519; Managing Director, ECIL v. B. Karunakar50 citing4 SCC 727 · 1993
- 44 citing
- Financial Corporation v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (2008) 9 SCC 31; State Bank of Patiala v. S.K. Sharma44 citing8 SCC 776 · 2006
- Panicker (CGG) v. CIT42 citing235 ITR 386 · 1999 · HC
- 41 citing
- Tejpal Singh v. The DCIT34 citing158 Taxmann.com 679 · 2024
- 327 (Delhi) and ACIT v. Serajuddin and Co.30 citing299 Taxmann 448 · 2024 · SC
- Shri. Krishan Kumar v. The DCIT18 citing162 Taxmann.com 518 · 2024 · ITAT
- 387 ITR 52113 citing387 ITR 521
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘A’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
PER RAJ PAL YADAV, VP
It is a group of six cross-appeals against separate orders of ld.CIT (Appeals) dated 13.12.2024 passed in ITA Nos.1256 to 1258/CHD/2024 & ITA Nos.179, 180 & 373/CHD/2025 2
assessment year 2017-18 and 2018-19 and dated 14.12.2024 passed in assessmen
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153D
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 603/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Sarat Chandra Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITA 602/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 66/CTK/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Babita Panda, Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central Circle 1, BhubaneswarITSSA 65/CTK/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026