ANSHUL ANIL GOEL,PUNE vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (1) 1, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the minor's income was clubbed with the assessee's, the corresponding TCS collected should also be given credit to the assessee. The amendment allowing such credit was considered retrospective in effect to avoid undue hardship.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed credit for Tax Collected at Source (TCS) amounting to Rs. 9,50,200/- collected in the name of his minor child, whose income was clubbed with the assessee's income. The CPC denied this claim during processing.
What were the issues?
Whether TCS collected in the name of a minor, whose income is clubbed with the parent, can be claimed as credit by the parent, especially when the relevant amendment is effective from a future date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing224 ITR 677 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Union of India v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.91 citing363 ITR 658 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R. K. PANDA, VP :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.11.2024 of the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Chennai relating to assessment year 2024-
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income on 30.07.2024 declaring total income of Rs.38,76,29,470/- and claimed total TDS of Rs.14,53,50,759/- and TCS of Rs.25,28,802/-. The break-up of TCS claimed by the assessee was as under: TCS of Rs.15,78,602/- collected for self TCS of Rs.9,50,200/- collected in the hands of his minor child whose income is clubbed in the income of the assessee.
2
During the year under consideration, the minor son of the assessee namely Master Nishkarsh Goel made a foreign investment on which t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 206C
- Abc Construction, Murshidabad vs I.T.O., Ward - 42(1), MurshidabadITA 703/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Income Tax Officer, Ward - 42(1)… vs Abc Construction, BerhmaporeITA 3070/KOL/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Aggarwal Iron & Steel Corporation, Ludhiana vs Jao Income Tax Officer Ward 5(1), LudhianaITA 903/CHANDI/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Shree Shanker Trading Co, Udaipur vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS…ITA 212/JODH/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- Shree Shankar Trading Co., Udaipur vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), UdaipurITA 202/JODH/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026