ABC CONSTRUCTION,MURSHIDABAD vs. I.T.O., WARD - 42(1), MURSHIDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee declared income and was selected for scrutiny due to substantial purchases without TDS deduction. The Assessing Officer made additions for bogus purchases and disallowance for non-deduction of TDS. The CIT(A) deleted the addition for bogus purchases but confirmed the TDS disallowance.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of purchases and restored the issue to the AO for fresh assessment. It also restored the TDS disallowance issue to the AO for verification and computation.
What were the issues?
Whether the genuineness of purchases was proved by the assessee and if additions under Section 69C were justified, and whether disallowance under Section 40a(ia) was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194Q,Section 40a(ia),Section 69C,Section 206C,Section 201(1),Section 37(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri George Mathan&Shri Gopalan Gurusamy]
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Gopalan Gurusamy, AM: These are the cross appeals preferred by the revenue and assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the Act dated 16.10.2025 for the AY 2023-24. 2. Brief facts are that the assessee has filed return of income for AY 2023-24 declaring total income at Rs. 4,01,40,610/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194Q
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Santosh Kumar Bhogi, Visakhapatnam vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 253/VIZ/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs Asst Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1…ITA 72/PAT/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs ACIT Circle 1, PatnaITA 155/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Champion Omdev Construction Limited…ITA 547/PAT/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026