UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S TATA CHEMICALS LTD.
What were the facts?
The Supreme Court was considering a batch of appeals concerning the Union of India (Revenue) and M/s Tata Chemicals Ltd. (Assessee/Deductor). The assessment years in question were on and after April 1, 1989. The core issue revolved around the Revenue's liability to pay interest on tax refunds made to a resident/deductor under Section 240 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals arose from judgments of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The specific context involved excess tax deducted at source by a resident deductor under Section 195, which was subsequently ordered to be refunded.
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that the Revenue is legally responsible for payment of interest on tax refunds made to a resident/deductor under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the language of Section 244A is precise, clear, and unambiguous, granting a substantive right to interest on refunds. The Court reasoned that the object behind Section 244A is to compensate for money remaining with the government, and there is no reason to restrict this benefit solely to assessees, excluding resident/deductors who have deposited excess tax. The obligation to refund money received and retained without right implies a corresponding right to interest. Regarding the period for which interest is payable, the Court held that since the present case did not fall under clause (a) or (b) of Section 244A, and the payment was not made pursuant to a notice under Section 156, interest is payable from the date of payment of tax, as per the opening words of clause (b) referring to 'as in any other case'. The Court affirmed that CBDT Circulars issued under Section 119 are binding on income tax authorities, even if they deviate from the Act, provided they mitigate the rigour for the benefit of the assessee. The appeals were dismissed.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Revenue is legally responsible under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for payment of interest on the refund of tax made to a resident/deductor under Section 240 of the Act? Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that Section 244A clearly mandates payment of interest on refunds. They contended that the object of Section 244A was to compensate for money retained by the government, and this benefit should extend to resident/deductors who have deposited excess tax. They relied on the principle that the obligation to refund money received without right carries with it the right to interest. They also pointed to CBDT Circulars clarifying the purpose of Section 244A. The assessee argued that interest should be payable from the date of payment of tax when the case does not fall under specific clauses (a) or (b) of Section 244A. Revenue's Contentions: The judgment does not explicitly record the Revenue's arguments. However, the appeals filed by the Union of India suggest they contested the entitlement to interest or the period from which it should be calculated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 244-A,Section 240,Section 195,Section 119,Section 156
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
A B c [2014] 3 S.C.R 298 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX v. M/S TATA CHEMICALS LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 6301 of 2011 etc.) FEBRUARY 26, 2014 [H.L. DATTU AND S.A. BOBDE, JJ.] INCOME TAX ACT, 1961: s.244-A - Liability of Revenue for payment of interest on refund of tax made to resident/deductor uls 240 - Held: The language of s. 244-A is precise, clear and unambiguous - Sub-s. (1) of s.244A speaks of interest on refund of the D amounts due to an assessee under the Act - Assessee is entitled for the said amount of refund with interest thereon as calculated in accordance with clauses (a) and (b) of sub-s. (1) of s.244A - In calculating the interest payable, the Section provides for different dates from which the interest is to be calculated - Interest payment to assessee is a statutory E obligation and non-discretionary in nature - s. 244-A grants substantive right of interest and is not procedural - The principles for grant of interest are the same as under the provisions of s.244 applicable to assessments before 01.04.1989, albeit with clarity of application as contained in F s. 244A - Department has also issued Circular clarifying the purpose a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 240
- Madhavan Kesavan Haridas, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5583/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Sheetal Santosh Shetye, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 31(2)(1), MumbaiITA 2690/MUM/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed3 Jul 2026AY 2018-2019
- Improvement Trust, Rajpura vs ITO Exemption, ChandigarhITA 419/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
- Nkb Infrastructure Private Limited, Rewari… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Rewari, HaryanaITA 5312/DEL/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed31 Jul 2025AY 2012-13
- Vinay Parmanand Hariani, Mumbai vs ITO International Taxation Ward 2(2)(1)…ITA 2891/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026