VIJAY TUKARAM RAUNDAL,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE

ITA 1636/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 September 2025AY 2015-16Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), MS ASTHA CHANDRA (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal admitted additional evidence obtained by the assessee through RTI, which had a bearing on the eligibility for deduction. Consequently, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IB(10) for a housing project. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, citing violations of completion timelines and unit area restrictions. The CIT(A) initially allowed the deduction, but the Tribunal later reversed this for a prior assessment year.

What were the issues?

Whether the housing project met the conditions for deduction under Section 80IB(10), and if additional evidence obtained via RTI should be admitted for a fresh assessment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80IB(10),Section 133A,Section 131(d),Section 115JC,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA

For Appellant: Shri Mihir Naniwadekar
For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde, CIT

PER R.K. PANDA, V.P:

ITA Nos.1634/PUN/2024 to 1636/PUN/2024 filed by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 28.06.2024 of the Ld. CIT(A), Pune -11 confirming the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income SA Nos.7 to 9/PUN/2025

Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80IB(10)

All 838 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80IB(10) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →