ACIT-24(1), PIRAMAL CHAMBERS vs. ATUL PROPERTIES, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in real estate, did not claim deduction under Section 80IB(10) in its returns for AY 2012-13 and 2013-14 due to a belief that a Completion Certificate was mandatory by the due date, despite completing construction. The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's omission to claim the deduction was due to a bona fide belief, and considering the peculiar facts and subsequent clarification of law, the claim could be entertained. The condonation of delay by the CIT(A) was also upheld.
What were the issues?
Whether a deduction under Section 80IB(10) can be allowed when not claimed in the original return, and if a bona fide omission due to a misunderstanding of law can be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IB(10),Section 80A(5),Section 139(1),Section 139(5),Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER BENCH : Both the appeals pertain to the same assessee filed by the revenue against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ADDL/JCIT (A)1-Guwahati [for brevity “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Years 2012-13 and ITA 8042 & 8043/MUM/2025 ATUL PROPERTIES
2013-14, date of orders 29.09.2025
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IB(10)
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Cosmos Constructions, ThaneITA 8234/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT-24(1), Mumbai, Piramal Chambers vs Atul Properties, MumbaiITA 8042/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Cosmos Enterprises, ThaneITA 8209/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2010-11
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Cosmos Enterprises, ThaneITA 8208/MUM/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2009-10
- Sethumadhavan Pujhanvidu Chellythody, Pune vs The ACIT Circle 7, PuneITA 449/PUN/2026[2010-21]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2026AY 2010-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026