ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 6(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. COSMOS ENTERPRISES, THANE
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order allowing pro-rata deduction under Section 80IB(10) for a housing project. The assessee claimed deduction for the 'Cosmos Park' project, but the AO denied it due to alleged violations of conditions related to project completion, unit size, and commercial area.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow pro-rata deduction under Section 80IB(10), finding it in consonance with High Court and Supreme Court judgments. However, it directed the AO to verify project completion based on evidence, not solely on the completion certificate, especially when applied for within the prescribed period.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for pro-rata deduction under Section 80IB(10) when there are alleged violations of its conditions, and whether the AO's denial based solely on the absence of a completion certificate is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: The aforesaid appeals are filed by the Revenue, against the consolidated order of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals – 54, Mumbai [in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 13.09.2025 for the Assessment Years (AY’s) 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2012-13. Before us, the appeals under consideration are for AYs 2009-10 and 2010-11. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue in both the aforesaid appeals are as under:
ITA No. 8208 & 8209/Mum/2025 Cosmos Enterprises “Grounds of ITA No.8208/Mum/20
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IB(10)
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Cosmos Constructions, ThaneITA 8234/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT-24(1), Piramal Chambers vs Atul Properties, MumbaiITA 8043/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-24(1), Mumbai, Piramal Chambers vs Atul Properties, MumbaiITA 8042/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2012-13
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Cosmos Enterprises, ThaneITA 8208/MUM/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2009-10
- Sethumadhavan Pujhanvidu Chellythody, Pune vs The ACIT Circle 7, PuneITA 449/PUN/2026[2010-21]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2026AY 2010-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026