OCEAN SPARKLE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE 5(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that gain or loss on restatement of foreign currency monetary items as on the balance sheet date should be recognized as income or expenses in the profit and loss account, following the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Woodward Governor India (P.) Ltd. The ITAT Hyderabad's contrary view in DCIT vs. Cyient Ltd. was not followed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction for administrative expenses including donations and provisions for doubtful debts, and also reduced taxable income by forex gain. The PCIT initiated proceedings under Section 263, and the AO made additions based on the PCIT's directions.
What were the issues?
Whether forex gain on restatement of liabilities as on the balance sheet date is taxable income, and whether it should be recognized in the profit and loss account.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing312 ITR 254 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT409 citing116 ITR 1 · 1979 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.120 citing294 ITR 451 · 2007 · HC · Read judgment
- DCIT v. Cyient Ltd.4 citing91 Taxmann.com 353 · 2018
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD “A” BENCH: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G
PER MANJUNATHA G. :
The above appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 14.08.2024 of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, relating to the assessment year 2010-2011. 2 ITA.No.1030/Hyd./2024
Brief facts of the case are that, the appellant company is engaged in the business of O & M of ports and Marine services. The assessee had filed it’s return of income for the Assessment year 2010-11 on 30.09.2010 admitting total income Rs.10,16,37,986/- under normal provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after claiming deduction u/sec.801A amounting to Rs.2,12,27,868/- and book profit u/sec.115JB of the Act at Rs.21,01,79,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026