CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.

294 ITR 451High Court2007#1010 most cited

What is CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd. authority for?

The amendment to Section 43A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is prospective and applies only from April 1, 2003. This means it governs changes in the actual cost of assets due to exchange rate fluctuations from that date onwards.

108

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd. · Woodward Governor · 294 ITR 451 · Section 43A · Section 43A amendment · prospective application · retrospective effect · actual cost of asset · depreciation · fixed assets · 1 April 2003 · Delhi High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.

ACIT SPL. RANGE-7, NEW DELHI vs. PRUDENT-AGRI COMMODITIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue partly allowed

ITA 1743/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Vimal Kumara.Y.: 2014-15 Acit, Special Range-7, Prudent Agri Commodities C.R. Building, New Delhi Vs India Pvt. Ltd., (Earlier M/S Sunder Agri Commodities India Pvt. Ltd.) 68/2, Rnm Centre, Janpath New Delhi – 110 001 (Pan: Aascs3922N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv., Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv., Sh. Sumit Lal Chandani, Adv. & Sh. Shivam Yadav, Adv. Department By : Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. Dr. Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.07.2025 Order Per Shamim Yahya, Am : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-Xxv, New Delhi Dated 21.12.2018 Pertaining To Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Company E-Filed Its Return Of Income For Ay 2014-15 On 26.11.2014 Declaring An Income Of Rs. 1,06,26,080/- The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Assessment Under Cass & Statutory Notice U/S. 143(2) Of The Act Was Issued On 28.08.2015. Thereafter, Notice Under Section 142(1) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Was Issued On 06.06.2016 & 12.09.2016

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur Hansra, Sr. DR
Section 10(35)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 37

…ssessee on account of fluctuation in the rate of foreign exchange as on the date of the balance- sheet is an item of expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Decision of the Delhi High Court in CIT v. WOODWARD GOVERNOR INDIA P. LTD. [2007] 294 ITR 451 affirmed. For valuing the closing stock at the end of a particular year, the value prevailing on the last date is relevant. This is because profit/loss is embedded in the closing stock. While anticipated loss is taken into account, anticipated profit in the shape of appreciated value of the closing stock is not brought into account, as no prudent…

ACIT-CIRCLE-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. M/S LICHEN METALS PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2766/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Amarjit Singh, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.2766/Mum/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2014-15) Acit, Circle-14(1)(1) बिधम/ M/S. Lichen Metals Pvt. Room No. 432, 4Th Floor, Ltd. Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Edelweiss House, Off C. Road, Mumbai-400020. S. T Road, Kalna, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400098. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabcl4440P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Ravikant Pathak Revenue By: Smt. Kavita Kaushik (Sr. Ar) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 06/02/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 10/02/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi, Dated 05.09.2022 For The Ay. 2014-15. 2. The Main Issue That Has Been Raised By The Revenue Is Against The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) Deleting The Addition Made By The Ao Of Rs.2,06,68,983/- On Account Of Mark To Market Loss On Trading Of Derivative By Treating It As Notional Loss.

For Appellant: Shri Ravikant PathakFor Respondent: Smt. Kavita Kaushik (Sr. AR)
Section 145

…e market value of the stock is less than the cost value. It was also expounded that the established and well settled practice in this regard should not be disturbed. Similar view was expressed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Woodward Governor 294 ITR 451 (SC). In this decision, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held that the accounts and the accounting method followed by an assessee continuously for a given period of time needs to be presumed to be correct till the Assessing Officer comes to the conclusion for reasons to be given that the system does not reflect true and correct profits. In the said cas…

Showing 120 of 108 · Page 1 of 6