GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. The appellate authorities' powers are not fettered by the decision in Goetz India Ltd. regarding admitting new claims.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed sales tax incentives as capital receipts. This claim was made for the first time before the CIT(A) as an additional ground of appeal, after the original return was processed and reassessment proceedings under Section 148 were initiated.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessee can raise a new claim for incentives as an additional ground before the CIT(A) during reassessment proceedings under Section 148.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing284 ITR 323 · 2006 · SC
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing312 ITR 254 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.814 citing198 ITR 297 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- TRF Ltd. v. CIT714 citing323 ITR 397 · 2010 · SC
- CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.577 citing306 ITR 392 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.120 citing294 ITR 451 · 2007 · HC · Read judgment
- Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT90 citing107 ITD 141 · 2007 · ITAT
- Karnataka in Karnataka State Co-Operative Apex Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 3(1) Bangalore10 citing283 Taxmann 98 · 2021 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, ‘H’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEM
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Gujrat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, New DelhiDelhi16 Jul 2025Remanded
Also relies on Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. The Tribunal admitted this ground and decided to adjudicate it, stating that the Goetz India Ltd. decision...
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S Gujrat Guardian Ltd., New DelhiDelhi16 Jul 2025Remanded
Also relies on Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not admitting the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. The appellate authorities have the power to adjudicate new claims, and the Goetz India Ltd. judgment does not...
- ACIT, New Delhi vs M/S Gujarat Guardian Ltd., New DelhiDelhi16 Jul 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. It admitted this ground and decided that appellate authorities can consider new claims. The Tribunal also ...
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Gujrat Guardian Ltd., New DelhiDelhi16 Jul 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not admitting the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. The Tribunal also allowed 60% depreciation on software purchase and allowed the bad debt claim subject to pro...
- Gujarat Guardian Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, New DelhiDelhi16 Jul 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Aztec Software & Technologies Services Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating the additional ground regarding sales tax incentives. The Tribunal admitted the ground and decided to adjudicate it, stating that appellate authorities are not ...
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026