NEOVANTAGE BIO-TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE 5(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to keep a legal issue concerning the benchmarking of interest open, pending the outcome of a Supreme Court decision. For other grounds, the appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer regarding verification of demerger schemes and deletion of notional interest additions.
What were the facts?
The assessees, M/s. Neovantage Innovation Park Private Limited and M/s. Neovantage Bio-Technology Private Limited, filed appeals against the final assessment orders for AY 2020-21. The appeals involved issues related to transfer pricing adjustments on interest paid on debentures and disallowance of unabsorbed depreciation.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved transfer pricing adjustments on interest paid on debentures and the allowability of set-off of unabsorbed depreciation. Another issue concerned the addition of notional interest on interest-free advances to a subsidiary.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA,Section 14A,Section 72A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Excel Industries Ltd.935 citing358 ITR 295 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.417 citing254 ITR 377 · 2002 · HC
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Roca Bathroom Products (P) ltd.269 citing140 Taxmann.com 304 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
PER MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, A.M. : These appeals are filed by M/s. Neovantage Innovation Park Private Limited and M/s. Neovantage Bio-Technology Private Limited (“the assessees”), feeling aggrieved by the separate final assessment orders passed by the respective Learned Assessing Officer
ITA Nos.923 & 924/Hyd/2024 2
(“Ld. AO”) u/s. 143(3) r.w.s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026