V.A. ADVISORY SERVICES PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-4, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had purchased the business as a going concern for a lump sum consideration. Since depreciation on goodwill was allowed in earlier years and is allowable as a capital asset, the disallowance by the lower authorities was unjustified.
What were the facts?
The assessee company acquired a running business on a slump sale basis. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed depreciation claimed on goodwill, viewing the transaction as a sale of specific assets rather than a going concern. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation on goodwill is allowable on the purchase of a business as a going concern, and whether the transaction qualified as a slump sale.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 32(1)(ii),Section 143(3),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing348 ITR 302 · 2012 · SC
- 60 Taxman 412 (SC) II. DIT v. HSBC Asset Management (I)(P) Ltd.23 citing47 Taxmann.com 286 · 2014 · HC
- India Capital Markets P Ltd. v. DCIT17 citing56 SOT 32 · 2013 · ITAT
- DIT v. HSBC Asset Management (I) (P) Ltd.11 citing228 Taxmann 365 · 2015 · HC
- ACIT v. ABB Limited4 citing14 SOT 18 · 2007 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI C.M.GARG & SHRI O.P.MEENA
PER O. P. MEENA, ACCOUTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Surat(in short “the CIT (A)”) dated 11.05.2015 pertaining to Assessment Year 2011-12 which in turn has arisen from the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4, Surat(in short
VA Advisory Services Pvt.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(1)(ii)
- Msrdc Sea Link Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4…ITA 3693/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 1(3)(2), MumbaiITA 977/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 1(3)(2), Mumbai vs Tata Communications Ltd, MumbaiITA 830/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Baleshwar Kharagpur Expressway Limited… vs PCIT-6, MumbaiITA 5714/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026