VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that TDS was not applicable on discounts to prepaid distributors as per the Supreme Court's decision. It also held that TDS was not deductible on year-end provisions reversed in the subsequent year, following High Court rulings. The disallowance of club expenses was also deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which partly confirmed adjustments made by the AO. The key issues involved disallowance of discount to prepaid distributors and year-end accruals under Section 40(a)(ia), and disallowance of club expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS is deductible on discounts to prepaid distributors and year-end accruals, and if club expenses are revenue or capital in nature.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(ia),Section 194H,Section 153(2),Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 144C(1),Section 201(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT654 citing82 ITR 363 · 1971 · SC · Read judgment
- Bharti Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT46 citing160 Taxmann.com 12 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Groz Beckert Asia Ltd.43 citing351 ITR 196 · 2013 · HC
- Mahindra & Mahindra Limited v. DCIT21 citing24 Taxmann.com 267 · 2012
- Karnataka in Subex Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax15 citing148 Taxmann.com 271 · 2023 · HC
- Framatone Connector O EN Ltd. v. DCIT, Special Rsange-2, Ernakulum9 citing294 ITR 559 · 2007 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI JAGADISH
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Coimbatore [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 23.12.2016 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 144C(1) r.w.s 143(3) of the Income-tax
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026