Section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 153(2) is 165 Taxman 95 (Del); (ii) CIT v. Atedhsy Films P. Ltd. (306 ITR 309), cited in 35 of the 69 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 153(2)
165 Taxman 95 (Del); (ii) CIT v. Atedhsy Films P. Ltd.
306 ITR 309 · 2008 · High Court
35
citing judgments
If a second notice for reassessment is issued and the assessee appears without objecting to the service of the first notice for 30 days, it is a valid presumption that the first notice was duly served. Repeated appearances of an authorized representative further corroborate valid service.
Pr. CIT v. Lionbridge Technologies Pvt. Lt
260 Taxmann 273 · 2019 · High Court
22
citing judgments
CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
311 ITR 235 · 2009 · High Court
21
citing judgments
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited v. DCIT
24 Taxmann.com 267 · 2012 · Reported
21
citing judgments
Fatechand Agarwal v. CWT
97 ITR 701 · 1974 · High Court
21
citing judgments
C.N. Nataraj and Others v. Vth Income Tax Officer, Bangalore
56 ITR 250 · 1965 · Reported
9
citing judgments
Jayanthi Talkies Distributors v. Commissioner of Income-tax
120 ITR 576 · 1979 · High Court
8
citing judgments
CIT v. Ramsukh Motilal
30 ITR 439 · 1956 · High Court
7
citing judgments
Dina Nath v. CIT
204 ITR 667 · 1993 · Reported
6
citing judgments
14 M/s Greatship (India) Ltd. v. ACIT, 5(1)(1) Court
398 ITR 645 · High Court
6
citing judgments
Judgments on Section 153(2)
Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4