CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO to compute Section 14A disallowances considering only investments yielding exempt income. It allowed depreciation on capital subsidy, stating it cannot be reduced from the actual cost of the asset. For weighted deduction, the issue was remanded to await DSIR's reply.
What were the facts?
The assessee company appealed against disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and confirmed by the CIT(A) concerning Section 14A disallowances, depreciation on capital subsidy, and weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB). The appeals covered multiple assessment years.
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the correct computation of disallowance under Section 14A, the treatment of capital subsidy for depreciation, and the eligibility for weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT1,183 citing328 ITR 81 · 2010 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.501 citing102 Taxmann.com 52 · 2019 · SC
- CIT v. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.105 citing358 ITR 47 · 2013 · HC
- Cummins India Ltd. v. DCIT67 citing96 Taxmann.com 576 · 2018 · ITAT · Read judgment
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Pr.CIT47 citing162 ITD 484 · 2017 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.41 citing111 Taxmann.com 338 · 2019 · ITAT
- CIT v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.34 citing250 Taxmann 270 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
आदेश आदेश
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)]all dated10.09.2024 for Assessment Years 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 and 2018-19.Since the facts and issues are common in these appeals, they are heard together an
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026