What is ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. authority for?

No disallowance under Section 14A is warranted if the Assessing Officer fails to record any finding regarding the incurrence of expenditure by the assessee for earning exempt income. The mere presence of sufficient interest-free funds in excess of interest-bearing funds does not automatically lead to a disallowance under Section 14A if no expenditure is linked to earning exempt income.

How many judgments cite ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.?

41 judgments on BharatTax cite ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. (111 Taxmann.com 338), spanning 2021 to 2025.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 35(2AB), Section 14A, Section 8D, Section 32(1)(iia), Section 35(3), Section 143(3).

ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. (111 Taxmann.com 338)

SRF LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal being ITA No

ITA 4539/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT DR

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 92BSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘H’: NEW DELHI. BEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4539/Del/2017 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) SRF Limited, vs. ACIT, Circle 1, C – 8, Commercial Complex, LTU, New Delhi. Safdarjang Development Area, New Delhi – 110 016. (PAN : AAACS0206P) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, CA Shri Ravi Kumar, CAR Shri Shubham, CA REVENUE BY : Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 15.10.2025 Date of Order : 12.12.2025 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : 1. These appeals are fi…

SRF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal being ITA No

ITA 80/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Sudhir Pareek

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT DR

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 92BSection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘H’: NEW DELHI. BEFORE SHRIS.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.4539/Del/2017 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) SRF Limited, vs. ACIT, Circle 1, C – 8, Commercial Complex, LTU, New Delhi. Safdarjang Development Area, New Delhi – 110 016. (PAN : AAACS0206P) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Pradeep Dinodia, CA Shri Ravi Kumar, CAR Shri Shubham, CA REVENUE BY : Shri S.K. Jadhav, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 15.10.2025 Date of Order : 12.12.2025 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : 1. These appeals are fi…

ACIT, LTU-2,, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2618/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Mr.A. Sasikumar, CIT

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एबी टी. वक", "ाियक सद" एवं एवं एवं एवं "ी अिमताभ शु"ा, लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2330/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 v. M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd., The ACIT, 1, Sardar Patel Road, Large Taxpayer Unit-2, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Chennai. [PAN: AAACA 4651 L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2618/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 v. The ACIT, M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd.…

ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,, CHENNAI

ITA 2330/CHNY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'डी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई।\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n'D' BENCH: CHENΝΑΙ\nश्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं\nश्री अमिताभ शुक्ला, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष\nBEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nआयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2330/Chny/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2015-16\nM/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd.,\n1, Sardar Patel Road,\nGuindy, Chennai-600 032.\n[PAN: AAACA 4651 L]\n(अपीलार्थी/Appellant)\nv.\nThe ACIT,\nLarge Taxpayer Unit-2,\nChennai.\n(प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent)\nआयकर अपील सं./ITA No.2618/Chny/2019\nनिर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment…

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2868/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.Samantha Mullamudi

Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)(ii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘ए ’"ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र ,"ाियक सद" एवं"ीअिमताभ शु#ा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2865, 2866, 2867 & 2868/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19) M/s. Carborundum Universal Vs The Assistant Commissioner Limited, of Income-tax, No. 43, VI Floor, Parry House Moore Large Taxpayer Unit-1, Street,Chennai GPO Parrys, – 600 001. Chennai. PAN : AAACC-2474-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अप…

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2867/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.Samantha Mullamudi

Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)(ii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘ए ’"ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र ,"ाियक सद" एवं"ीअिमताभ शु#ा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2865, 2866, 2867 & 2868/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19) M/s. Carborundum Universal Vs The Assistant Commissioner Limited, of Income-tax, No. 43, VI Floor, Parry House Moore Large Taxpayer Unit-1, Street,Chennai GPO Parrys, – 600 001. Chennai. PAN : AAACC-2474-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अप…

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

ITA 2866/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2865, 2866, 2867 & 2868/Chny/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19) M/S. Carborundum Universal Vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Limited, No. 43, Vi Floor, Parry House Moore Street,Chennai Gpo Parrys, – 600 001. Pan: Aaacc-2474-P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) Large Taxpayer Unit-1, Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate प्रत्यर्थीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Mrs.Samantha Mullamudi, Addl.Cit सुनवाईकी तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 05.05.2025 आदेश / Order Per Manu Kumar Giri, Jm: The Captioned Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)(Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)]All Dated10.09.2024 For Assessment Years 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19.Since The Facts & Issues Are Common In These Appeals, They Are Heard Together & Disposed Off By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.Samantha Mullamudi

Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)(ii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'ए 'न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A' BENCH, CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवंश्रीअमित_भ शुक्ल लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2865, 2866, 2867 & 2868/Chny/2024 (निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19) M/s. Carborundum Universal Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Limited, No. 43, VI Floor, Parry House Moore Street,Chennai GPO Parrys, – 600 001. PAN: AAACC-2474-P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) Large Taxpayer Unit-1, Chennai. (प्रत…

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2865/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs.Samantha Mullamudi

Section 115JSection 14ASection 8D(2)(ii)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,‘ए ’"ायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी मनु कुमार िग"र ,"ाियक सद" एवं"ीअिमताभ शु#ा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.2865, 2866, 2867 & 2868/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2014-15, 2016-17 & 2018-19) M/s. Carborundum Universal Vs The Assistant Commissioner Limited, of Income-tax, No. 43, VI Floor, Parry House Moore Large Taxpayer Unit-1, Street,Chennai GPO Parrys, – 600 001. Chennai. PAN : AAACC-2474-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अप…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU CIRCLE 1 CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. E I D PARRY INDIA LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3251/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathait(Tp)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & Ita No.3113/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 234, Dare House, Nsc Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [Pan: Aaace-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 92BSection 92C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी ’ "यायपीठ, चे" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी जॉज" जॉज" के, उपा"य" एवं "ी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & ITA No.3113/CHNY/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner of No. 234, Dare House, NSC Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [PAN: AAACE-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) I.T.A. No. 3251…

M/S. EID PARRY INDIA LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3113/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathait(Tp)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & Ita No.3113/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of No. 234, Dare House, Nsc Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [Pan: Aaace-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 92BSection 92C

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी ’ "यायपीठ, चे" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी जॉज" जॉज" के, उपा"य" एवं "ी एस.आर.रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A. Nos.:105, 106, 107/Chny/2024 & ITA No.3113/CHNY/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s. E.I.D. Parry India Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner of No. 234, Dare House, NSC Vs. Income Tax, Bose Road, Parrys Corner, Large Taxpayer Unit -1, Chennai 600 001. Chennai. [PAN: AAACE-0702-C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) I.T.A. No. 3251…

DCIT-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. L AND T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA\nNo

ITA 1666/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

For Appellant: \nShri Alpesh Dharod,ARFor Respondent: \nDr. K.R. Subhash (CIT-DR)

Section 10(34)Section 14A

…that\nassessee had sufficient interest free funds in excess of interest bearing\nfunds to make investment which would result in exempt income, doesn't\nresult in disallowance under Sec. 14A. Also relied on in the case of ACIT\nvs. Crompton Greaves Ltd. [2020] 181 ITD 40 (Mum) wherein the\nHon'ble Mumbai Tribunal held that where no finding at all had been\nrecorded by Assessing Officer as to incurrence of any expenditure by\nassessee for earning exempt income, no disallowance under section 14A\nwas called for.After considering the facts of the case and examining the\nappellant's submissions, it was held by the ld.…

DCIT-14.1.1, , MUMBAI vs. L AND T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA\nNo

ITA 3568/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

For Appellant: \nShri Alpesh Dharod,ARFor Respondent: \nDr. K.R. Subhash (CIT-DR)

Section 10(34)Section 14A

…that\nassessee had sufficient interest free funds in excess of interest bearing\nfunds to make investment which would result in exempt income, doesn't\nresult in disallowance under Sec. 14A. Also relied on in the case of ACIT\nvs. Crompton Greaves Ltd. [2020] 181 ITD 40 (Mum) wherein the\nHon'ble Mumbai Tribunal held that where no finding at all had been\nrecorded by Assessing Officer as to incurrence of any expenditure by\nassessee for earning exempt income, no disallowance under section 14A\nwas called for.After considering the facts of the case and examining the\nappellant's submissions, it was held by the ld.…

ACIT-7(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA vs. GREAVES COTTON LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6548/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai13 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Ble & Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Amol Patankar, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT D/R

Section 143(1)Section 148Section 35

…| आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण "ायपीठ, मुंबई | IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 6548/Mum/2024 Assessment Year: 2011-12 ACIT – 7(1)(1), Mumbai Greaves Cotton Limited Vs Unit No. 701, 7th Floor Tower 3, Equinox Business Park LBS Marg Maharashtra - 400070 [PAN: AAACG2062M] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Amol Patankar, A/R Revenue by : Shri Dr. Kishor Dhule, CIT D/R सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 11/02/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 13/02/202…

M/S. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-8(1), LTU-II, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2379/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Mr.R. VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Mr.Nathala Ravi Babu, CIT

Section 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’"यायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ीएबीटी. वक", "ाियक सद" एवं एवं एवं एवं "ीअिमताभशु"ा, लेखासद"केसम" BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 2379/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 v. M/s. Ashok Leyland Ltd., The DCIT, No.1, Sardar Patel Road, NCC-8(1), LTU-II, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. Chennai-600 034. [PAN: AAACA 4651 L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate & Mr. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर स…

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA vs. GUJARAT STATE FERTILIZER & CHEMICAL LTD, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 538/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah, Shri Jimi Patel and Shri Rushin Patel, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Durga Dutt, CIT (DR) &

Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 80GSection 8D(2)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 348/Ahd/2020 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) Gujarat State Fertilizers & The Assistant Commissioner Vs. Chemicals Ltd., of Income-tax, PO Fertilizernagar, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara, Gujarat-391750 Vadodara [PAN : AAACG 7996 C] I.T.A. No.538/Ahd/2020 & CO No. 9/Ahd/2021 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) Gujarat State Fertilizers & The Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Chemicals Ltd., Income-tax, PO Fertilizernagar, Circle 1(1)(1), Vadodara, Gujarat-391750 Vadodara [PAN : AAACG 7996 C…

GUJARAT STATE FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE-1(1)1(), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 348/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah, Shri Jimi Patel and Shri Rushin Patel, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Durga Dutt, CIT (DR) &

Section 115Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144(2)Section 14ASection 35Section 80GSection 8D(2)(ii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 348/Ahd/2020 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) Gujarat State Fertilizers & The Assistant Commissioner Vs. Chemicals Ltd., of Income-tax, PO Fertilizernagar, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara, Gujarat-391750 Vadodara [PAN : AAACG 7996 C] I.T.A. No.538/Ahd/2020 & CO No. 9/Ahd/2021 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) Gujarat State Fertilizers & The Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Chemicals Ltd., Income-tax, PO Fertilizernagar, Circle 1(1)(1), Vadodara, Gujarat-391750 Vadodara [PAN : AAACG 7996 C…

SUNDARAM FASTENERS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 3236/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.3236/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 V. M/S.Sundram Fasteners Ltd., The Dcit, 98-A, 7Th Floor, Corporate Circle-6(2), Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Chennai. Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. [Pan: Aaacs 8779 D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vikaram VijayaraghavanFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT

…t. M/s.Sundram Fasteners Ltd. :: 7 :: 4.2 Assailing the action of the AO/DRP, the Ld.AR submitted that the AO erred in disallowing of Rs.68,16,688/- and cited the decision of Mumbai Tribunal in the case of ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd., reported in [2020] 181 ITD 40 (Mum.), wherein, similar issue had come up for consideration and the Tribunal held as under: 3. Apropos ground no.1, the Assessing Officer ('A.O.', for short) noted, after verifying Form Nos. 3CM and 3CL concerning the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s. 35(AB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act', for short), that the eligible amount, as n…

S KANT HEALTHCARE LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-5(3)(1), MUMBAI

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 1975/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Vipin Goyal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Manish Ajudiya, Sr. A.R

Section 143(3)Section 35

…tion 35(2AB) of the Act on the surmise that prescribed authority has only approved part of expenditure in form No.3CL. We find no merit in the said order of authorities below. Similar is the decision of Mumbai Tribunal in ACIT V/s M/s. Crompton Greaves Ltd. (111 Taxmann.com 338; 27/09/2019) and various other decisions as placed on record. We find that fact as well as issue is pari-materia the same. In the absence of any contrary decision on record, respectfully following the above decisions, we would hold 7 M/s. S. Kant Healthcare Ltd. that the assessee would be entitled for deduction u/s 35(2AB) on actual exp…

DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI vs. EICHER MOTORS LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 3721/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 35

…124 taxmann.com 73 (Bangalore - Trib.) DCIT v. STP Ltd.: [2021] 187 ITD 538 (Kolkata - Trib.) DCIT v. Force Motors: [2021] 91 ITR(T) 8 (Pune - Trib.) MAHLE Behr India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT: [2021] 190 ITD 852 (Pune - Trib.) ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.: [2020] 181 ITD 40 (Mumbai - Trib.) M/s. Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT: ITA No.704/Bang/2020 (Bangalore - Trib.) M/s. Mahindra Electric Mobility Ltd. v. ACIT [ITA No.641/Bang/2017 (Bangalore - Trib.) M/s. Indfrag Limited v. ACIT [ITA No.98/Bang/2018 (Bangalore - Trib.) In view of the aforesaid, the assessee is eligible for claiming deduction on the entire expe…

EICHER MOTORS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 7(1) NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

ITA 3525/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2015-16

Section 35

…124 taxmann.com 73 (Bangalore - Trib.) DCIT v. STP Ltd.: [2021] 187 ITD 538 (Kolkata - Trib.) DCIT v. Force Motors: [2021] 91 ITR(T) 8 (Pune - Trib.) MAHLE Behr India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT: [2021] 190 ITD 852 (Pune - Trib.) ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.: [2020] 181 ITD 40 (Mumbai - Trib.) M/s. Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT: ITA No.704/Bang/2020 (Bangalore - Trib.) M/s. Mahindra Electric Mobility Ltd. v. ACIT [ITA No.641/Bang/2017 (Bangalore - Trib.) M/s. Indfrag Limited v. ACIT [ITA No.98/Bang/2018 (Bangalore - Trib.) In view of the aforesaid, the assessee is eligible for claiming deduction on the entire expe…

ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

What is ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd. authority for?

Also referred to as

Also reported as

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Crompton Greaves Ltd.

SRF LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI

SRF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

ACIT, LTU-2,, CHENNAI vs. ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED, CHENNAI

ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,, CHENNAI

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-1, CHENNAI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU CIRCLE 1 CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. E I D PARRY INDIA LIMITED, CHENNAI

M/S. EID PARRY INDIA LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, LTU-1,, CHENNAI

DCIT-14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. L AND T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE CO. LTD, MUMBAI

DCIT-14.1.1, , MUMBAI vs. L AND T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, MUMBAI

ACIT-7(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA vs. GREAVES COTTON LIMITED, MUMBAI

M/S. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-8(1), LTU-II, CHENNAI

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA vs. GUJARAT STATE FERTILIZER & CHEMICAL LTD, VADODARA

GUJARAT STATE FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LTD.,,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE-1(1)1(), VADODARA

SUNDARAM FASTENERS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(2), CHENNAI

S KANT HEALTHCARE LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-5(3)(1), MUMBAI

DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI vs. EICHER MOTORS LIMITED, DELHI

EICHER MOTORS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 7(1) NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI