MAHAYOGI VEMANA SOUHARDA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGHA,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that societies registered under the Karnataka Souharda Society Act are at par with societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, and are eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. Therefore, the assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, was treated as an assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS on interest paid to its members under Section 194A of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) raised a demand for Rs. 38,42,770/- including interest. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, is eligible for deduction under Section 80P and thus not liable for TDS under Section 194A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194A,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 80P,Section 2(19)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Government of India Ministry of Finance v. Karnataka State Souhadra Dedral Co-operative Ltd.12 citing134 Taxmann.com 170 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld. Addl/JCIT(A), Thiruvanantpuram dated 11/02/2025 in DIN No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1073127657(1) for the assessment year 2018- 19.
The only issue raised by the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in treating the assessee as ‘assessee in default’ on account of non deduction of TDS on the payment of interest to members u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act.
2.1 The AO during the asst. proceedings found that the assessee is registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act and, therefore, it is liable for deduction of TDS on the payment made to the members u/s 194A of the Act. It was also observed by the AO that the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Swabhimani Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. bearing No. 48414/2018 dated 16-01-2020, has not reached to its finality as the revenue has preferred an appeal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Thus, the AO raised a demand u/s 201(1) along with the interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act amounting to Rs. 38,42,770/- on account of non-deduction of TDS u/s 194A of the Act. On appeal, the ld.CIT(A) confirmed the order of the AO.
Being aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us.
The ld. AR before us submitted that the assessee is registered under Karnataka Souharda Society Act which is also eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act in view of the judgment cited above. Therefore, the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS under section 194A of the Act.
On the other hand, the ld. DR could not controvert the argument advanced by the ld. AR of the assessee.
We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on record. At the outset, we note that society registered under Karnataka Souharda Society Act are at par with the societies registered under Karnataka co-operative society’s Act 1959 by virtue of judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Government of India Ministry of Finanace Vs. Karnataka State Souharda Federal Co-operative Ltd. reported in 134 taxmann.com 170. The relevant extract is reproduced as under:
The provisions of section 80P offers tax deduction in respect of income of Co-operative Societies which is enacted with a laudable object of promoting Co-operating moment. Such benefit cannot be denied to the so called Co-operatives under the Souharda Act merely on hyper technicalities. The interpretation given by the Revenue to section 2(19) of the Act is untenable. A harmonious reading of the said provisions would indicate that Co-operative Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 alone is not the Cooperative Society for the purposes of the Income-tax Act, as the phrase 'or' employed with the following words 'under any other law for the time being in force in any State for the registration of Co-operative Society' if read, Co-operative Societies registered under the Souharda Act which is a State enactment would certainly be construed as Co-operative Society coming within the ambit of section 2(19).
Thus, for the reasons aforesaid, we find no jurisdictional error in the order passed by the learned Single Judge in extending the benefit of section 80P to the entities registered under the Souharda Act.
From the above judgment, there is no ambiguity that the assessee in the present case is a society and eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act therefore, the assessee cannot be treated as assessee in default on account of non-deduction of TDS on the payment of interest u/s 194A of the Act. Accordingly, we set aside the finding of the ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the addition made by him. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced in court on 2nd day of July, 2025
More judgments on Section 194A
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Welspun Aunta Simaria Project Private… vs DCIT, Circle-78(1), DelhiITA 6559/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1713/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Hexad Infosoft Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 1712/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026