DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. AMD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition made by the AO on account of assets received free of cost was not taxable under Section 28(iv) and deleted the consequent mark-up. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue's grounds regarding the exclusion of certain comparables, finding them to be functionally different or of significantly different size.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, AMD India Private Ltd., appealed against an order partly allowing its appeal against a transfer pricing adjustment. The Revenue also appealed against the deletion of certain transfer pricing adjustments.
What were the issues?
Whether assets received free of cost are taxable under Section 28(iv) and the comparability of certain companies for transfer pricing adjustment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.164 citing255 Taxmann 305 · 2018 · SC
- CIT v. Ramaniyam Homes Pvt. Ltd.48 citing384 ITR 530 · 2016 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
Per Prashant Maharishi, Vice President
IT(TP)A No.1859/Bang/2024 is filed by AMD India Private Ltd. (the assessee/appellant) for the assessment year 2013-14 against the appellate order passed by the CIT(Appeals), Bengaluru-12 [ld. CIT(A)] dated 31.7.2024 [ld. CIT(A)]wherein the appeal filed by
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 28(iv)
- Bharat Cottage Industries, Mumbai vs Circle 41(4)(1), MumbaiITA 2904/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited, Kadugodi… vs ITO, Ward-4(1)(3), BangaloreITA 2206/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Lotus Refineries Private Limited, Chandigarh vs ACIT, ChandigarhITA 450/CHANDI/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- JCIT(OSD), Range-10, ITO C.R. Building vs Gem Agrofoods Pvt. Ltd., Shanti NiketanITA 1227/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT Circle Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar vs Rajena Agro Products Private Limited, PatanITA 2096/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026