DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 8(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MUKESH D AMBANI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the BUP IDs were not account numbers and that the assessee did not hold any account beneficially with HSBC Bank, Geneva. The Tribunal also found that the reassessment proceedings were not valid.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of foreign bank accounts and interest income. The assessee had allegedly not disclosed these foreign accounts and income in his returns. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on information received regarding foreign bank accounts held by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the BUP IDs constituted bank accounts and whether the assessee had undisclosed foreign bank accounts and income. The validity of the reassessment proceedings was also an issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 149(1)(c),Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 535 (Del); 6. Tata Teleservices v. UOI163 citing100 Taxmann.com 324 · 2016 · HC
- K.M. Sharma v. ITO136 citing254 ITR 772 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- Renu T Tharani v. DCIT (International Taxation)15 citing117 Taxmann.com 84 · 2020
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER BENCH:
These six appeals filed by the Revenue and corresponding six Cross Objections filed by the assessee are against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-50, Mumbai, dated
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026