DCIT - 8(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SIEMENS TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES PVT. LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the Section 10A deduction, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s reasoning and noting that the AO could not controvert the assessee's submissions. The Tribunal also dismissed the revenue's ground regarding software consumable expenses, following a previous ITAT decision in favor of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed a significant portion of the deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 10A, citing discrepancies in profit margins and depreciation allocation between units eligible for deduction and others. The assessee argued for the scientific basis of their allocations and the independent nature of their units.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for Section 10A deduction despite alleged discrepancies in profit and depreciation allocation, and whether software consumable expenses are revenue or capital in nature.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Textile Machinery Corporation Ltd. v. CIT165 citing107 ITR 195 · 1977 · SC
- DCIT v. Sankhya Infotech Ltd.5 citing12 Taxmann.com 169 · 2011
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
Per Amarjit Singh (AM): These three appeals file
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026