THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1), MYSURU vs. M/S. BHORUKA ALUMINIUM LIMITED, MYSURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 50B of the Income Tax Act mandates that capital gains on a slump sale are to be computed in the year of transfer, irrespective of deferred payments. The provisions of Section 50B override the general principles of receipt or accrual for determining the taxability of such gains.
What were the facts?
The assessee company sold its aluminum extrusion business via a slump sale for a total consideration of Rs. 110 Crores. A portion of this consideration was deferred, contingent on achieving sales targets and resolving legal disputes. The Assessing Officer sought to tax the entire Rs. 110 Crores in the year of transfer, while the assessee offered only the amount received initially.
What were the issues?
Whether deferred consideration in a slump sale is taxable in the year of transfer as per Section 50B, or only upon receipt/accrual as per general capital gains provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.551 citing46 ITR 144 · 1962 · SC
- E.D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd. v. CIT256 citing26 ITR 27 · 1954 · SC · Read judgment
- Morvi Industries Ltd. v. CIT136 citing82 ITR 835 · 1971 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
Per N. V. Vasudevan, Vice President :
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against order dated 30.09.2019 of CIT(A), Mysuru, relating to Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The only issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the CIT(A) was justified in holding that a sum of Rs.10 Crores cannot be brought to tax as capital gain under section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’) on slump sale of one it’s undertaking by the assessee under business transfer agreement dated 01.03.2013, in AY 2014-15. As per section 2(42C) of the Act, ‘slump sale’ means the transfer of one or more undertakings as a result of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50B
- DCIT, Circle-22(2), Delhi vs Savista Global Solutions Private Limited…ITA 1729/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- R.S.Jhaveri & Co., Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2441/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- R.S.Jhaveri & Co., Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2440/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- ITO, Mumbai vs Suresh Amrutrao Chavan, MumbaiITA 5305/MUM/2025[2012]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026
- Dosch Pharmaceutucals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 2088/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026