R.S.JHAVERI & CO.,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE–1, AURANGABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee, a partnership firm, received Rs. 6 crores for relinquishing its agency business. The Assessing Officer treated this as revenue receipt and made an addition to the total income. The assessee claimed it as a capital receipt.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the Rs. 6 crore receipt, following its decision in a related appeal. For the commission disallowance, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for further verification.
What were the issues?
Whether the Rs. 6 crore received for relinquishing agency business is a capital or revenue receipt, and the allowability of commission expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 69,Section 132(4),Section 153A,Section 28(va),Section 56,Section 2(42C),Section 50B,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
The above 2 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 02.09.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A), Pune-12 relating to assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17 respectively. Since identical grounds have been raised in both the appeals, therefore, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of steel plates. The said firm is having agency of Dillinger GTS Ventes (DGV) which is a foreign company and the said
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026