GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD ( CORPORATE FINANCE DIVISION),MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 6(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's ground regarding disallowance under Section 43B as infructuous. Regarding depreciation on let-out property, the Tribunal found merit in the revenue's contention but noted the lack of specific provisions for excluding such assets from block of assets for depreciation calculation. The Tribunal also remitted the issue of including excess provision written back and prior period adjustments for Section 80IA deduction back to the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Grasim Industries Limited, filed its return of income for AY 2006-07. The Assessing Officer made additions and disallowances, leading to an assessment order. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's appeal, and both the assessee and the revenue filed further appeals before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation is allowable on assets let out for rent when income is offered under 'Income from House Property', and whether excess provisions written back and prior period adjustments should be included for Section 80IA deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43B,Section 32,Section 22,Section 24,Section 43(6),Section 80IA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT1,392 citing448 ITR 518 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT654 citing82 ITR 363 · 1971 · SC · Read judgment
- Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT622 citing124 ITR 1 · 1980 · SC
- Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT621 citing227 ITR 172 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.577 citing306 ITR 392 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd. v. CIT429 citing228 ITR 253 · 1997 · SC
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing224 ITR 677 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- M.M.Aqua Technologies Limited v. CIT308 citing129 Taxmann.com 145 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT289 citing156 ITR 188 · 1992 · SC
- E.D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd. v. CIT256 citing26 ITR 27 · 1954 · SC · Read judgment
- Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT201 citing30 SOT 374 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. K. Srinivasan129 citing83 ITR 346 · 1972 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Manjula J. Shah113 citing355 ITR 474 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd.108 citing341 ITR 467 · 2012 · HC
- M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi102 citing2021 SCC OnLine SC 575 · 2021
- CIT v. Sham Lal Bansal51 citing200 Taxmann 14 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- Chambal Fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. v. JCIT49 citing107 Taxmann.com 484 · 2019 · HC
- CIT v. Gloster Jute Mills Ltd.48 citing96 Taxmann.com 303 · 2018 · HC
- Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Bihar43 citing48 ITR 123 · 1963 · SC
- CIT v. Sulzer India Ltd.38 citing369 ITR 717 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Shri Goverdhan Ltd.37 citing69 ITR 675 · 1968 · SC
- Essar Oil Ltd. v. ACIT33 citing42 Taxmann.com 21 · 2014 · ITAT
- 59 ITR 51431 citing59 ITR 514 · HC
- Avada Trading Company (P) Ltd. v. ACIT30 citing100 ITD 131 · 2006 · ITAT
- CIT v. Balkrishna Industries Ltd.21 citing300 CTR 209 · 2017 · SC
- Panchkula vs. Micro Instruments Co. (2016) 388 ITR 46 (P&H); Commissioner of Income-tax v. Dunlop Rubber Co. (II) Ltd.15 citing107 ITR 182 · 1977 · HC
- Technimont (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT15 citing116 Taxmann.com 996 · 2020
- Joint Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.13 citing145 Taxmann.com 420 · 2022 · SC
- Taylor Instrument Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT11 citing198 ITR 1 · 1992 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, G BENCH, MUMBAI
Per Rahul Chaudhary:
These are cross-appeals for Assessment Year 2006-2007 preferred against the order, dated 18/05/2009, passed by the Commissioner
ITA No.3762 & 4385/Mum/2009 Assessment Years: 2006-2007 of Income Tax (Appeals)-VI, Mumbai, [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- ACIT 6(3), Mumbai vs Grasim Industries Ltd, MumbaiMumbai25 Feb 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on Technimont (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's ground regarding disallowance under Section 43B as infructuous. Regarding depreciation on let-out property, the Tribunal found merit in the revenue's contention that depreciation can...
- The ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai vs M/S. Grasim Industries Ltd, MumbaiMumbai4 Jul 2023Partly Allowed
Also relies on Technimont (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal entirely. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, indicating that some grounds were decided in favor of the assessee and others against it.
- DCIT Cir. 6 (3), Mumbai vs M/S. Grasim Industries Ltd., MumbaiMumbai23 Jun 2023Partly Allowed
Also relies on Technimont (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the conditions for deduction under Section 80IA were satisfied, including the existence of an agreement with a statutory body for operating an infrastructure facility. The Tribunal dismissed the Re...
- Tata Consumer Products Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Cir.-4(1), KolkataKolkata17 Sept 2024Partly Allowed
Also relies on Joint Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2014-15. For AY 2015-16, the Tribunal directed the AO to apply 0.5% as corporate guarantee fee instead of 2% and dismissed other grounds as not pressed. The grounds related t...
- DCIT, Circle - 11(1), Kolkata vs M/S. Graphite India Ltd., KolkataKolkata13 Sept 2024Partly Allowed
Also relies on Joint Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.
The Tribunal decided that education cess is not deductible as an expenditure under Section 37 read with Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following the Supreme Court's decision. It also held that profit on s...
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026