C. I. T vs. M/S SHREE LAXMI INDUSTRIAL CO.

PDF · subscribers
ITR/14/1994HC RajasthanRJHC02001263199418 April 2001Bench: BALIA RAJESH,SUNIL KUMAR GARG3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Income Tax Reference Application should be dismissed as not pressed. The Court took note of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which sets a monetary limit of Rs. 20,00,000/- for filing appeals before the High Court. Since the tax effect in the present case was indisputably less than Rs. 20 lac, the application was deemed to be covered by the circular's provisions for withdrawing or not pressing pending appeals below the specified limits. The Court clarified that any substantial questions of law raised in the reference application were left open to be examined in an appropriate future proceeding. The Revenue was also granted liberty to move an application for recalling the order if the reference application fell under any of the exceptions mentioned in the circular.

What were the facts?

This is an Income Tax Reference Application filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Jaipur, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The tax effect in dispute is less than Rs. 20 lac. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued Circular No. 21/2015 on December 10, 2015, under Section 268A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to regularize monetary limits for filing appeals by the Revenue. This circular aimed to reduce litigation and applied retrospectively to pending appeals. The High Court noted that pending appeals below the specified tax limits could be withdrawn or not pressed. The present application was filed before the High Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Income Tax Reference Application, with a tax effect less than Rs. 20 lac, should be dismissed in light of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which prescribes monetary limits for filing appeals before the High Court. Assessee (Revenue) Arguments: The Revenue contended that the present reference application, having a tax effect of less than Rs. 20 lac, falls within the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 for filing appeals before the High Court. Therefore, the application should be dismissed as not pressed, as per the circular's directive to withdraw or not press pending appeals below the specified limits. Respondent (Assessee) Arguments: The judgment does not record specific arguments from the respondent (Maliram Puranmal, Jaipur).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A(1),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Reference Application No.14/1994

CIT Jaipur vs. Maliram Puranmal, Jaipur

Date of Order : 6th September, 2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr. Anuroop Singhi, for the appellant. Mr. Siddharth Ranka for the respondents. JUDGMENT --------- Instant reference application is directed against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and indisputably the tax effect as brought to our notice, is less than Rs.20 lac. A Circular No.21/2015 has been issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 10.12.2015 in exercise of its power u/sec. 268A (1) of the Income-tax Act 1961 in supersession of the Boards instruction No.5/2014 dt.10.7.2014 regularising the monetary limits for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal, High Courts and Apex Court with an object for reducing litigation. Relevant para nos.3, 8, 9 and 10 reads ad infra :- “3. Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder :- S. No. Appeals in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs.) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be

2 filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. 4. xxx xxx xxx 5. xxx xxx xxx 6. xxx xxx xxx 7. xxx xxx xxx 8. Adverse judgments relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect: (a) Where the Constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge, or (b) Where Board's order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or (c) Where Revenue Audit objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or (d) Where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets/bank accounts. 9. The monetary limits specified in para 3 above shall not apply to writ matters and direct tax matters other than Income tax. Filing of appeals in other Direct tax matters shall continue to be governed by relevant provisions of statute & rules. Further, filing of appeal in cases of Income Tax, where the tax effect is not quantifiable or not involved, such as the case of registration of trusts or institutions under section 12 A of the IT Act, 1961, shall not be governed by the limits specified in para 3 above and decision to file appeal in such cases may be taken on merits of a particular case. 10. This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.” The extract of the paragraphs referred to supra, clearly indicates that the limits specified in para 3 may not apply to certain exceptions specified in para 8, at the same time para nos.9 and 10 of the Circular if read conjointly, clearly envisages that the present instructions will apply retrospectively to all the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/Tribunals, subject to exceptions where the tax effect even if is less than Rs.20 lac, can be

3 preferred in High Courts. Taking note of the CBDT Circular dt. 10/12/2015 and the tax effect which indisputably in the instant case is less than Rs.20 lac, much less than what has been prescribed for filing appeals before the High Courts, deserves to be dismissed as not pressed. However, it is made clear that the substantial questions of law raised in the instant reference application, if any, are left open to be examined in an appropriate proceeding, if arises in future. At the same time we consider it appropriate to observe that if the reference application falls in any of the exceptions as referred to in the Circular dt. 10/12/2015, the Revenue will be at liberty to move an application for recalling of the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of the CBDT Circular dated 10.12.2015 the Income Tax reference application stand dismissed as not pressed.

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA),J. (K.S.JHAVERI),J. A.Sharma/3

More judgments on Section 268A(1)

All 190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →