THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD, THRISSUR vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR
What were the facts?
This is an appeal by The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. (the assessee) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, dated October 17, 2014, in ITA No. 326/Coch/2014. The appeal is directed against the assessment order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-I, Thrissur (the revenue). The specific assessment year(s) and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in this excerpt. The procedural history indicates that the assessee is challenging the ITAT's order before the High Court of Kerala.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala, in its judgment dated September 4, 2015, held that the provisions of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are indeed applicable to the interest paid by the assessee to the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI). The Court reasoned that the assessee's argument that IDBI is not a notified institution under Section 10(23G) or Section 10(23FC) is irrelevant for the application of Section 40(a)(iib). The Court found that the Tribunal had correctly interpreted and applied the provisions of Section 40(a)(iib), which disallows deduction of any interest, royalty, or fees for technical services paid to a public financial institution referred to in clause (a) of Section 40A(2) or to a scheduled bank, if such interest, royalty, or fees are paid on or after the 1st day of April 2002. The operative direction was to uphold the order of the ITAT, meaning the disallowance of interest paid to IDBI was confirmed.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are applicable to the assessee, thereby disallowing the deduction of interest paid to the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI)? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argues that Section 40(a)(iib) is not applicable to interest paid to IDBI, as IDBI is not a financial institution notified by the Central Government under Section 10(23G) or Section 10(23FC) of the Act. They contend that the interest paid to IDBI should be allowed as a deduction. Revenue's Contention: The revenue contends that the Tribunal correctly applied Section 40(a)(iib) and disallowed the interest paid to IDBI, as it falls within the ambit of the said section, leading to a disallowance of the deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(iib),Section 10(23G),Section 10(23FC),Section 40A(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/13RD BHADRA, 1937 -------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 326/COCH/2014 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 17.10.2014) APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------------ THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK BHAVAN, ST. MARY'S COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR - 680 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.C.K. GOPINATHAN. BY ADVS.SRI.R.MOHANDAS SRI.R.KISHORE KUMAR (MATTANCHERRY) SRI.MANOJ KUMAR.M RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------- THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -I, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 020. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG
Appendix — schedule of exhibits
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(iib)
- Lifestyle International Private Limited… vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 2…ITA 824/BANG/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2021-22
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Rajasthan State Road Development and…ITA 1920/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed2 Jul 2026AY 2018-19
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsingpur vs Asst. Commissioner of Incometax, Circle…ITA 149/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsingpur vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 148/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
- Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 197/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026