Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 40A(2) is CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. (103 Taxmann.com 57), cited in 306 of the 74 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 40A(2)

CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd.
103 Taxmann.com 57 · 2019 · Supreme Court
306
citing judgments
CIT v. Saravana Spinning Mills Ltd.
293 ITR 201 · 2007 · Supreme Court
109
citing judgments

Expenditure for replacement of machinery parts qualifies as 'current repairs' under Section 31(i) of the Income-tax Act if it does not result in a new asset or substantially enhance the existing asset's life. For Section 31(i), the critical factor is whether the expense constitutes current repairs, making the general revenue vs. capital distinction less relevant for that specific section.

CIT v. Indo Saudi Services (Travel) Pvt. Ltd.
310 ITR 306 · 2009 · High Court
109
citing judgments

An expenditure disallowance is not sustainable solely because both the payer and payee are assessed to tax at the same rate, particularly in the context of sections like 40A(2) or 36(1)(iii).

Capital Bus Service Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
123 ITR 404 · 1980 · High Court
91
citing judgments

Depreciation under section 32 is allowable even if an asset is not actively used, provided it is kept in a condition of readiness or is put ready for use, as this amounts to passive user.

Climate Systems India Ltd. v. CIT
319 ITR 109 · 2009 · High Court
67
citing judgments
CIT v. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd.
355 ITR 14 · 2013 · High Court
61
citing judgments

For Section 80IA and 80IB deductions, the profits of an eligible industrial undertaking or unit must be computed independently based on its actual profitability and market-rate inter-unit transactions, rather than applying a global profit margin of all the assessee's units.

CIT v. Kanda Rice Mills
178 ITR 446 · 1989 · High Court
53
citing judgments

The Principal Commissioner cannot exercise revisionary powers under Section 263 by merely stating that further enquiry is required or by simply setting aside the assessment order. To revise an assessment, the Principal Commissioner must establish how the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

PCIT v. Hindusthan Aeronautics Ltd.
143 Taxmann.com 357 · 2022 · High Court
43
citing judgments

Interest expenditure should not be disallowed under Section 14A when the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds available to make investments yielding exempt income. This principle applies to the computation of disallowance under Rule 8D.

Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalis & Chemicals Ltd.
88 Taxmann.com 722 · 2017 · High Court
35
citing judgments

Goodwill arising on amalgamation is a capital asset. Depreciation is allowable on goodwill if it has been acquired by the assessee. The cost of acquisition for depreciation purposes is the amount paid for goodwill at the time of amalgamation.

Mather & Platt (India) Ltd. v. CIT
168 ITR 493 · 1987 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Deduction for commission payments cannot be disallowed solely because summons served on commission agents were returned unserved, especially if the agents may have moved addresses years after the transactions.

Judgments on Section 40A(2)

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE vs. MARUTI ENTERPRISE, RAJKOT

ITA 228/RJT/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhasr. It(Ss)A No Assessment Assessee Name Respondent Name No. Year 1. 12/Rjt/2024 2014-15 Deputy Commissioner Shri Chetan Dhirajlal Rokad Of Income-Tax, Central 1, Pearl Plaza, 150 Ft Ring Circle-1, Rajkot, Road, Near G.T. School “Amruta Estate” 2Nd Rajkot-360 001 Floor, M.G. Road, Rajkot-360 001 Pan.:Afkpr4637P 2. 13/Rjt/2024 2014-15 Deputy Commissioner Shri Nikhilbhai Jamnadas Of Income-Tax, Central Patel Circle-1, Rajkot, P-1, Decora Highland, “Amruta Estate” 2Nd Avadh Main Road, Opp. Floor, M.G. Road, Classic Party Plot Rajkot- Rajkot-360 001 360 005 Pan No.: Agipp 1294 K 3. 17/Rjt/2024 2013-14 Deputy Commissioner Shri Dhirajlal Ravji Rokad Of Income-Tax, Central 1, Pearl Plaza, 150 Ft Ring Circle-1, Rajkot, Road, Near G.T. School “Amruta Estate” 2Nd Rajkot-360 001 Floor, M.G. Road, Rajkot-360 001 Panno.:Abopr5408A 19 & 2017-18 & Deputy Commissioner Shri Rohitkumar Maganlal 4. 20/Rjt/2024 2018-19 Of Income-Tax, Central Sanepara Circle-1, Rajkot, Kangshiyani Road, Opp. “Amruta Estate” 2Nd Sundaram Vidhyalaya, Floor, M.G. Road, Dholra Chokdi, Kothariya, Rajkot-360 001 Rajkot-360 004 Panno.:Aaopp4848H 5. 59-60/Rjt/2023 2017-18 & Deputy Commissioner M/S Maruti Enterprise 2018-19 Of Income-Tax, Central Decora West Hills, Near Classic Party Plot, Opp. Circle-1, Rajkot, Kalawa Road, Rajkot-360 “Amruta Estate” 2Nd 005 Floor, M.G. Road, Rajkot-360 001 Panno.:Abdfm3140K 6. 228/Rjt/2023 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner M/S Maruti Enterprise Of Income-Tax, Central

Section 250

Showing 120 of 74 · Page 1 of 4