DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-06, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITED , JAIPUR
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of disallowance of guarantee commission and interest/penalty paid on delayed GST payments. The Assessing Officer had disallowed these amounts under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that guarantee commission is a contractual and voluntary payment, not a fee or charge exclusively levied by the state government. Similarly, interest and penalty on delayed GST payments were found to be compensatory and not covered by Section 40(a)(iib).
What were the issues?
Whether guarantee commission paid by a state undertaking to the state government is a disallowable expense under Section 40(a)(iib), and whether interest and penalty on delayed GST payments are also disallowable under the same section.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, “B” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA& SHRI UDAYAN DASGUPTA
Per: Smt. Annapura Gupta, Accountant Member:- The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Office of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”), dated 21.10.2025 under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).
P a g e | 2 Rajasthan State Road Development and Construction Ltd.
The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are read as under:- “1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the learned Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(iib)
- Lifestyle International Private Limited… vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 2…ITA 824/BANG/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2021-22
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsingpur vs Asst. Commissioner of Incometax, Circle…ITA 149/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
- Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsingpur vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 148/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
- Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 197/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
- Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 196/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026