COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD vs. TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. NIZAMS FAMILY (REMAINDER WEALTH TRUST), HYDERABAD

CIVIL APPEAL No. 467/1971Supreme Court[1977] 3 S.C.R. 73503 May 1977Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: P.N. BHAGWATI, N.L. UNTWALIA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI23 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The case involves the assessment of wealth tax on the Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam's Family (Remainder Wealth Trust) for assessment years not specified. The Trust deed divided the corpus into 175 units, with 164 allocated to relatives. Beneficiaries were entitled only to the income from their allocated units, not the corpus. The Wealth Tax Officer initially assessed wealth tax on the value of units allocated to beneficiaries. Subsequently, the Wealth Tax Officer assessed the remainder wealth under Section 21(4), deeming beneficiaries of remainder estates unknown and their shares indeterminate. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner annulled these assessments, viewing the trust deed as creating multiple distinct trusts. The Tribunal held Section 3 was subject to Section 21, Section 21(1) was inapplicable, and Section 21(4) was applicable due to unknown remainder beneficiaries.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the trustees constituted an assessable unit and were liable to be assessed to wealth tax as an "individual" under Section 3. Section 3 is subject to other provisions of the Act, including Section 21, and must yield to Section 21 where it makes special provisions for assessing a trustee. Section 21 is mandatory, and assessment on a trustee must be made in accordance with its provisions. The assessment contemplated under Section 21(1) or 21(4) is in a representative capacity, assessing the beneficiaries' interests through the trustee. Section 21(1) applies when trust properties are held for a single beneficiary or where individual shares are determinate and known. In such cases, wealth tax is levied on the trustee in respect of the beneficiary's interest. The Revenue has two modes: assessment on the trustee in a representative capacity under Section 21(1) or direct assessment on the beneficiary. The Court found that in this case, it was possible to determine with certainty and definiteness on each valuation date who the beneficiaries would be and their specific shares in the remainder wealth if the life tenant died. Therefore, Section 21(1) was applicable, and Section 21(4) was excluded. The appeals were dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the trustees were liable to be taxed under Section 3 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, in the status of an "individual"? (Question of law) 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of Section 3 should be considered as subject to the provisions of Section 21? (Question of law) 3. Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that under Section 21(4) the remainder wealth could be assessed in respect of each of the several units or groups of units allocated in favour of the beneficiaries? (Question of mixed law and fact) 4. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of Section 21(4) are applicable? (Question of law) Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that beneficiaries were only entitled to a life interest in the corpus and thus could not be assessed on the entire value. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this, leading to the remainder wealth escaping tax. The assessee contended that the Wealth Tax Officer was not justified in clubbing the entire remainder wealth in a single assessment. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue contended that the assessees were liable to be assessed as an individual under Section 3 in respect of the entire corpus of the trust fund, and Section 21(4) was merely a machinery provision that did not override the charge imposed under Section 3.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 3,Section 21(1),Section 21(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

• 735 COMMISSIONER OF WEALTII TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD TRUSTEES OF H.E.H. NIZAM'S FAMILY (REMAINDER WEALTH TRUST), HYDERABAD May 3, 1977 [P. N. BHAGWATI, N. L. UNTWALIA AND S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JJ.] Wealth Tax Act 1957-Ss. 3, 21(1) and 21(4)-Scope of.

Section 21(1) of the Wealth Tax Act provides that in case of assets charge- able to tax under the Act which are held by . . . . . . . . any trustee appointed under a Trust, wealth tax shall be levied upon and recoverable from the ........ trustee in the like manner and to the same extent as it would be leviable upon and recoverable from the person on whose behalf the assets are held. Sub-section ( 4) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where the shares of the persons on whose behalf or for ·whose benefit a:ny such assets are held are indeterminate or unknown, wealth tax shall be levied upon and recovered_ from the trustee as if the p~rsons on whose behalf or for whose benefit the assets are held were an individual for the purposes of this Act.

The corpus of a family trust created by the Nizam of Hyderabad was notion- ally divided into 175 equal units, out of which 16lt units w

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 3

All 288 judgments and leading authorities on Section 3 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →