MILIND MANOHAR BARVE,MUMBAI vs. WARD 4(1), THANE, THANE
What were the facts?
The assessee, an individual, filed a revised return of income under the new tax regime (Section 115BAC(1A)). The assessee claimed a rebate under Section 87A on the tax payable on short-term capital gains (STCG) taxable under Section 111A. The CPC disallowed this rebate during processing under Section 143(1) without providing reasons.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that there is no express bar in Sections 87A or 111A for allowing rebate on STCG. Denial of rebate based solely on system-driven processing by CPC is not sustainable. Statutory benefits cannot be curtailed by automated logic.
What were the issues?
Whether a rebate under Section 87A is allowable on tax payable on short-term capital gains taxable under Section 111A for an assessee opting for the new tax regime (Section 115BAC(1A)).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 115BAC(1A),Section 87A,Section 111A,Section 143(1),Section 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H(SMC
Per: Anikesh Banerjee (JM): The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal) ADDL/JCIT (A), Madurai [for brevity the “Ld. CIT(A)”], order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2024-25, date of order 12.12.2025. The impugned
2 Milind Manohar Barve order emanated from the order of the Deputy Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru (for brevity the ‘Ld. AO’) order passed under section 154 r.w.s. 143(1) of the Act date of order 14.11.2024. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BAC(1A)
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Office Court… vs Anant Kumar Shah, BeawarITA 1122/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026